[si] (SISR-DOC2) QA Review of Semantic Interpretation last ca ll draft
Answer to comment about "Non-specification specifications"
Answer to comment about extensibility
Answer to Comment about HTML spec examples needs refinement
Answer to comment about the complexities of normative references
Answer to comment on "confusing structure and numbering"
Answer to comment on "parsing the definition of specification"
Answer to comment on "Specifying conformance" wording
Answer to comment on the term "Umbrella specification"
answer to Dave Marston comment on Conformance section for a technology or for a specification (005)
answer to Dave Marston comment on What's a core module
Answer to Ian Hickson Structure Numbering Confusing
Answer to Ian Hickson: Additions to "write tests"
Answer to Ian Hickson: Additions to error mechanism section
Answer to Ian Hickson: Avoiding device-dependent profiles
Answer to Ian Hickson: Case of RFC2119 terms
Answer to Ian Hickson: Comment about HTML spec exa mples needs refinement
Answer to Ian Hickson: Conformance is not a yes/no proposition (wrt filling an ICS)
Answer to Ian Hickson: Correction to example about CSS extensibility
Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity
- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (Wednesday, 18 May)
- Ian Hickson (Monday, 16 May)
- Karl Dubost (Monday, 16 May)
- Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 16 May)
- Al Gilman (Monday, 16 May)
- Bjoern Hoehrmann (Monday, 16 May)
- Al Gilman (Monday, 16 May)
- Karl Dubost (Monday, 16 May)
- Henri Sivonen (Monday, 16 May)
- Ian Hickson (Monday, 16 May)
- Karl Dubost (Friday, 13 May)
- Al Gilman (Wednesday, 4 May)
- Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson: Modesty requirement
Answer to Ian Hickson: Scope also helps reviewers determine when the specificati...
Answer to Ian Hickson:Formal vs prose language nor mativity
Answer to Jeremy Carrol
Answer to OMG
Answer to Paul Grosso about Classes of Products
answer to TAG comment on Conformance clause optionality
Answer to TAG comment on editorial comments
Answer to TAG comment on error processing requirements
Answer to TAG comment on extensions and conformance
answer to TAG comment on ICS needs more than y/n/n-a
answer to TAG comment on Suggestions of examples for section 2.3
answer to TAG comment on Text in example of section 2.3 needs fixing
answer to TAG comment on unclear legend for illustration section 4.1
Answer to TAG comment on using our own example
answer to TAG comment on wording in tips
answer to TAG comment on workflow
answer to TAG issue on positive statements for non applicability
answer to TAG issue on SpecGL ICS
Answer to to WAI CG on Need Clarifications for 2.2 Requirement A
Answer to Tony Cincotta about revised text
Answer to Tony Cincotta about typos
Answer to WAI CG on Address Accessibility in Requirements
Answer to WAI CG on Deprecation in case of
Answer to WAI CG on Deprecation in case of WCAG1.0/WCAG2.0
Answer to WAI CG on detailed table of contents
Answer to WAI CG on extensibility in the case of WCAG2.0
Answer to WAI CG on Formal Language vs. Prose: Ambiguity
Answer to WAI CG on Managing Variability in WCAG2.0
Answer to WAI CG on Need Clarifications for 2.2
Comunicamos que consta em nosso banco de dados Pend�ncias Financeiras em seu CPF/CNPJ
Conformance to EARL
Do as I say, not as I do!
Final minutes QA WG Teleconference May 16
formal vs. prose and PR [was: Re: Final minutes QA WG Teleconference May 16]
Internet Backgammon
ISSUE 1049: Resolution?
Minutes QA Working Group Teleconference 2005-05-09
Objection to resolution of LC comment [was: Answer to Paul Grosso about Classes of Products]
OK Re: formal vs. prose and PR [was: Re: Final minutes QA WG Teleconference May 16]
Test Development FAQ released
Last message date: Tuesday, 31 May 2005 15:29:31 UTC