- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 19:22:37 +0200
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
On Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 5:19:48 PM, Karl wrote: KD> Dear Chris, KD> Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework: KD> Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004 KD> After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will KD> be considered as if you had accepted the comment. KD> Original comment (issue 1157 [1]): KD> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0013.html KD> As a response to your comment, the QA Working Group has accepted your KD> comment and has added verbiage to new version of the ICS with KD> - a comments column, KD> - absolute links to the spec, KD> - asking users to link back to the relevant spec parts. [2]: KD> "The presentation is intended to be convenient for KD> organizers and evaluators of QA projects in KD> W3C Working Groups, to facilitate assessing KD> specifications against the checkpoints. The table KD> includes spaces for scoring each checkpoint, "yes" KD> (satisfied), "no" (not satisfied), "n/a" (not KD> applicable), and comments. Great so far. KD> Users of this ICS are encouraged to put links in KD> the comments column back to the reviewed specification KD> parts illustrating how it conforms to the Specification KD> Guidelines." Okay. You prefer a link from comments rather than from the "yes" column? I suppose the comments can have multiple links. OK, fine. KD> [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/ KD> [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1157 KD> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/specgl-ics -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 17:23:53 UTC