W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > May 2005

answer to Dave Marston comment on Conformance section for a technology or for a specification (005)

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:59:10 -0400
Message-Id: <296EBE36-88C4-416B-92CB-3E963FA4751D@w3.org>
Cc: David Marston <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
To: www-qa@w3.org

Dear Dave,

Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework:
Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004

After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will  
be considered as if you had accepted the comment.

Original comment (issue 986 [1]):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Aug/0099.html


As a response to your comment, the QA Working Group has not accepted  
your comment. An additional decision of the QA WG has removed the  
"Umbrella Specification" topic from Specification Guidelines to move  
it to Variability in Specifications. One technique of Requirement 01  
addresses the notion of Conformance when the technology is divided in  
multiple documents.



[0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/
[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=986
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#include- 
conformance-clause-principle


-- 
Karl Dubost
QA Working Group Chair
http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 15:59:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:36 UTC