- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:53:11 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Dear Chris, Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework: Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004 After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will be considered as if you had accepted the comment. Original comment (issue 1149 [1]): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0004.html As a response to your comment, the QA Working Group has accepted your comment and the following examples[2] have been added to SpecGL: [[[ As a separate example, any specification that defines the behavior of a class of product that creates XML should address creation of XML 1.1 and anticipate future XML versions. In XSLT, creation of XML is specified by <xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" />, and each version of XSLT defines the allowable range of values for the version attribute. Another option is to reference the XML Infoset - for instance, XML Inclusions are compatible both with XML 1.0 and XML 1.1 since they reference normatively the XML Infoset, which is the same for the two versions of XML. In its section Referencing the Unicode Standard and ISO/IEC 10646, the specification Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0: Fundamentals [CHARMOD] gives a detailed indications for referencing Unicode Standard and ISO/ IEC 10646. Specification editors are encouraged to follow these recommendations. ]]] [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/ [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1149 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#ref-define-ex -- Karl Dubost QA Working Group Chair http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 15:53:51 UTC