W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > May 2005

Answer to TAG comment on using our own example

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:12:46 -0400
Message-Id: <D9DFD8D7-D35D-4046-B05D-D266D9F65F67@w3.org>
Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
To: www-qa@w3.org

Dear Chris,

Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework:
Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004

After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will  
be considered as if you had accepted the comment.

Original comment (issue 1155):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0011.html

The QA Working Group agrees that being more specific about the story can
only helps understand the point made and is now making an explicit
reference to itself in the text:
     In 2004, QA Working Group documents entered Candidate
     Recommendation prior to a thorough quality review, resulting in a
     huge number of issues to resolve and the eventual retreat back to
     Working Draft for major revisions.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#practice-principle

(while the story doesn't exactly match the reality of what happened, the
QA Working Group believes it can still be used as a fair illustration of
the point made)

[0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/


-- 
Karl Dubost
QA Working Group Chair
http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 15:13:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:36 UTC