- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 14:37:11 -0400
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
Dear Chris, You replied to that your answer was partially satisfied. We discussed about your concerns at the last QA WG meeting [1] See Below the resolution Le 05-05-03 à 12:21, Chris Lilley a écrit : > On Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 5:03:49 PM, Karl wrote: > KD> Original comments (issues 1151, 1143, and part of 1158): > Thank you for the response. It partially satisfies the concerns I > raised. > > A first publication of a specification can still have deprecated > features, if there was a previous poorly documented, undocumented, or > defined-by-implementation version. Does your wording imply that a > specification at version 1.0 can still be conformant even if it > does not > state "There are no deprecated features"? > [...] > Requirement 12: Identify deprecated features. > might be better as > Requirement 12: Identify deprecated features or state that there are > none. Our resolution is: * We will reword the text to make the deprecation possible at version 1.0 of a technology * We will NOT change the requirement text for it * We will propose a technique to take into account your request. Thanks. [1] http://www.w3.org/mid/ 5.1.1.5.2.20050510084627.00aa63a8@mailserver.nist.gov -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 18:37:25 UTC