W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > May 2005

Answer to Jeremy Carrol

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 12:03:17 -0400
Message-Id: <110BCBE2-03FA-4C00-8B7F-02B986A94E1F@w3.org>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: www-qa@w3.org

Dear Jeremy,

Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework:
Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004

After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will  
be considered as if you had accepted the comment.

Thank you for your SpecGL review comments [1].  We especially  
appreciate the positive feedback, about what you think works well in  
SpecGL.  Your single identified substantive issue regarding  
identification of deprecated features, versus first versions of  
specifications, was entered as issue #1051 [2].  The QA Working Group  
accepted the comment, and we have revised the wording around  
Requirement 12 [3] to indicate that the requirement is contingent on  
there being previous version(s) of the specification.

[0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Jan/0018.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1051
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#deprecated- 
feature-principle

-- 
Karl Dubost
QA Working Group Chair
http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 16:03:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:36 UTC