- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 12:03:17 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Dear Jeremy, Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework: Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004 After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will be considered as if you had accepted the comment. Thank you for your SpecGL review comments [1]. We especially appreciate the positive feedback, about what you think works well in SpecGL. Your single identified substantive issue regarding identification of deprecated features, versus first versions of specifications, was entered as issue #1051 [2]. The QA Working Group accepted the comment, and we have revised the wording around Requirement 12 [3] to indicate that the requirement is contingent on there being previous version(s) of the specification. [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Jan/0018.html [2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1051 [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#deprecated- feature-principle -- Karl Dubost QA Working Group Chair http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 16:03:44 UTC