W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Answer to TAG comment on editorial comments

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 18:22:38 +0200
Message-ID: <111366318.20050503182238@w3.org>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa@w3.org

On Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 5:10:16 PM, Karl wrote:

KD> Dear Chris,

KD> Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework:
KD> Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004

KD> After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will
KD> be considered as if you had accepted the comment.

KD> Original comments (issues 1152, 1153)
KD> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0008.html
KD> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0009.html

KD> The QA Working Group applied to suggested corrections to the text, as
KD> illustrated at:
KD> *
KD> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#degree-support- 
KD> principle
KD> now reads "Define how each each class of product handles each depreacted
KD> feature."
KD> *
KD> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#formal-language-gp
KD> has been reworded and doesn't include the quoted text any longer


KD> [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/

Thank you for clearing up those minor editorial issues.




-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 16:22:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:14:01 GMT