www-qa@w3.org from May 2005 by author

Al Gilman

Re: Answer to WAI CG on Address Accessibility in Requirements (Wednesday, 25 May)
Re: ISSUE 1049: Resolution? (Tuesday, 24 May)
OK Re: formal vs. prose and PR [was: Re: Final minutes QA WG Teleconference May 16] (Monday, 23 May)
formal vs. prose and PR [was: Re: Final minutes QA WG Teleconference May 16] (Monday, 23 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity (Monday, 16 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity (Monday, 16 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity (Wednesday, 4 May)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity (Monday, 16 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity (Monday, 16 May)

Brian Huisman

Re: Do as I say, not as I do! (Saturday, 7 May)

Charles McCathieNevile

Conformance to EARL (Tuesday, 24 May)

Chris Lilley

Re: answer to TAG issue on positive statements for non applicability (Friday, 13 May)
Re: answer to TAG comment on Suggestions of examples for section 2.3 (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: answer to TAG comment on Text in example of section 2.3 needs fixing (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: answer to TAG issue on SpecGL ICS (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: answer to TAG comment on ICS needs more than y/n/n-a (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: answer to TAG comment on ICS needs more than y/n/n-a (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: answer to TAG comment on Conformance clause optionality (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: answer to TAG comment on wording in tips (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: answer to TAG comment on workflow (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: answer to TAG comment on unclear legend for illustration section 4.1 (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to TAG comment on using our own example (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to TAG comment on error processing requirements (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to TAG comment on editorial comments (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: answer to TAG issue on positive statements for non applicability (Tuesday, 3 May)

david_marston@us.ibm.com

Re: answer to Dave Marston comment on Conformance section for a technology or for a specification (005) (Monday, 9 May)
Re: answer to Dave Marston comment on What's a core module (Monday, 9 May)

Dominique Hazaël-Massieux

Re: formal vs. prose and PR [was: Re: Final minutes QA WG Teleconference May 16] (Monday, 23 May)
Final minutes QA WG Teleconference May 16 (Monday, 23 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity (Wednesday, 18 May)
Test Development FAQ released (Wednesday, 11 May)

Ellen Cooper

Internet Backgammon (Thursday, 26 May)

Gary Feldman

Re: Answer to Comment about HTML spec examples needs refinement (Tuesday, 3 May)

Henri Sivonen

Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity (Monday, 16 May)

Ian Hickson

Re: ISSUE 1049: Resolution? (Tuesday, 31 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity (Monday, 16 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity (Monday, 16 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Additions to "write tests" (Monday, 16 May)
Re: Answer to OMG (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Modesty requirement (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Additions to error mechanism section (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Additions to "write tests" (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson Structure Numbering Confusing (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Correction to example about CSS extensibility (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Avoiding device-dependent profiles (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Case of RFC2119 terms (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Comment about HTML spec exa mples needs refinement (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Scope also helps reviewers determine when the specificati... (Tuesday, 3 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Conformance is not a yes/no proposition (wrt filling an ICS) (Tuesday, 3 May)

Jens Meiert

Re: Answer to OMG (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to OMG (Tuesday, 3 May)

Jeremy Carroll

Re: Answer to Jeremy Carrol (Thursday, 26 May)

Karl Dubost

Re: ISSUE 1049: Resolution? (Tuesday, 31 May)
Re: Objection to resolution of LC comment [was: Answer to Paul Grosso about Classes of Products] (Tuesday, 31 May)
ISSUE 1049: Resolution? (Tuesday, 24 May)
Re: formal vs. prose and PR [was: Re: Final minutes QA WG Teleconference May 16] (Monday, 23 May)
Re: Answer to Paul Grosso about Classes of Products (Wednesday, 18 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity (Monday, 16 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity (Monday, 16 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Modesty requirement (Friday, 13 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Additions to "write tests" (Friday, 13 May)
Re: Answer to Ian Hickson: Formal vs prose language normativity (Friday, 13 May)
Re: answer to TAG issue on positive statements for non applicability (Friday, 13 May)
Answer to WAI CG on extensibility in the case of WCAG2.0 (Wednesday, 11 May)
Answer to WAI CG on Deprecation in case of (Wednesday, 11 May)
Answer to WAI CG on detailed table of contents (Wednesday, 11 May)
Answer to WAI CG on Address Accessibility in Requirements (Wednesday, 11 May)
Answer to WAI CG on Need Clarifications for 2.2 (Wednesday, 11 May)
Answer to WAI CG on Managing Variability in WCAG2.0 (Wednesday, 11 May)
Answer to WAI CG on Formal Language vs. Prose: Ambiguity (Wednesday, 11 May)
Answer to to WAI CG on Need Clarifications for 2.2 Requirement A (Wednesday, 11 May)
Answer to WAI CG on Deprecation in case of WCAG1.0/WCAG2.0 (Wednesday, 11 May)
Answer to Paul Grosso about Classes of Products (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Tony Cincotta about revised text (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Tony Cincotta about typos (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Jeremy Carrol (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to comment about the complexities of normative references (Tuesday, 3 May)
answer to Dave Marston comment on Conformance section for a technology or for a specification (005) (Tuesday, 3 May)
answer to Dave Marston comment on What's a core module (Tuesday, 3 May)
answer to TAG comment on Suggestions of examples for section 2.3 (Tuesday, 3 May)
answer to TAG comment on Text in example of section 2.3 needs fixing (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson Structure Numbering Confusing (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson: Modesty requirement (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson:Formal vs prose language nor mativity (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson: Additions to "write tests" (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson: Additions to error mechanism section (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson: Correction to example about CSS extensibility (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson: Avoiding device-dependent profiles (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson: Case of RFC2119 terms (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Comment about HTML spec examples needs refinement (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson: Scope also helps reviewers determine when the specificati... (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson: Conformance is not a yes/no proposition (wrt filling an ICS) (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson: Comment about HTML spec exa mples needs refinement (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson: Scope also helps reviewers determine when the specificati... (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to Ian Hickson: Conformance is not a yes/no proposition (wrt filling an ICS) (Tuesday, 3 May)
answer to TAG issue on SpecGL ICS (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to comment about "Non-specification specifications" (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to comment on the term "Umbrella specification" (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to comment on "parsing the definition of specification" (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to comment on "confusing structure and numbering" (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to comment on "Specifying conformance" wording (Tuesday, 3 May)
answer to TAG comment on ICS needs more than y/n/n-a (Tuesday, 3 May)
answer to TAG comment on Conformance clause optionality (Tuesday, 3 May)
answer to TAG comment on wording in tips (Tuesday, 3 May)
answer to TAG comment on workflow (Tuesday, 3 May)
answer to TAG comment on unclear legend for illustration section 4.1 (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to TAG comment on using our own example (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to TAG comment on error processing requirements (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to TAG comment on editorial comments (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to TAG comment on extensions and conformance (Tuesday, 3 May)
answer to TAG issue on positive statements for non applicability (Tuesday, 3 May)
Answer to comment about extensibility (Tuesday, 3 May)

Lofton Henderson

Re: formal vs. prose and PR [was: Re: Final minutes QA WG Teleconference May 16] (Monday, 23 May)

mcf

Comunicamos que consta em nosso banco de dados Pend�ncias Financeiras em seu CPF/CNPJ (Sunday, 22 May)

Paul Grosso

Objection to resolution of LC comment [was: Answer to Paul Grosso about Classes of Products] (Wednesday, 25 May)
RE: Answer to Paul Grosso about Classes of Products (Wednesday, 18 May)

Tim Boland

Minutes QA Working Group Teleconference 2005-05-09 (Wednesday, 18 May)

Van Tichelen, Luc

RE: [si] (SISR-DOC2) QA Review of Semantic Interpretation last ca ll draft (Wednesday, 18 May)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 May 2005 15:29:31 UTC