W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Answer to Jeremy Carrol

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 15:21:25 +0100
Message-ID: <4295DB65.7040305@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
CC: www-qa@w3.org

Karl Dubost wrote:
> 
> Dear Jeremy,
> 
> Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework:
> Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004
> 
> After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will  be 
> considered as if you had accepted the comment.
> 
> Thank you for your SpecGL review comments [1].  We especially  
> appreciate the positive feedback, about what you think works well in  
> SpecGL.  Your single identified substantive issue regarding  
> identification of deprecated features, versus first versions of  
> specifications, was entered as issue #1051 [2].  The QA Working Group  
> accepted the comment, and we have revised the wording around  
> Requirement 12 [3] to indicate that the requirement is contingent on  
> there being previous version(s) of the specification.
> 

Fine - that's great.

Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2005 14:21:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:36 UTC