W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > May 2005

answer to TAG comment on workflow

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:16:06 -0400
Message-Id: <746A5002-F858-436A-94CA-D6768A4FE2D7@w3.org>
Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
To: www-qa@w3.org

Dear Chris,

Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework:
Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004

After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will  
be considered as if you had accepted the comment.

Original comment (issue 1144 [1]):

As a response to your comment where it was pointed out that the  
specification was mixing workflow and specification editing, the QA  
Working Group has accepted your comment and decided to create a new  
section which is not mandatory : "Beyond Conformance."[2]

This section contains previous Good Practices which were workflow  
related and that a WG might want to explore during the specification  
editing. Some of the good practices have been rewritten as well to  
remove their workflow orientation when it was not necessary.

You might want to take a look at the table of changes[3] to not be lost.

[0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/
[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1144
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#beyond- 
[3] http://www.w3.org/QA/2005/04/specgl-table.html

Karl Dubost
QA Working Group Chair
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 15:16:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:36 UTC