W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > May 2005

answer to TAG comment on ICS needs more than y/n/n-a

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:19:48 -0400
Message-Id: <9DA2C37C-7C45-4DF8-8A3F-6F6E5E605F3D@w3.org>
Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
To: www-qa@w3.org

Dear Chris,

Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework:
Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004

After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will  
be considered as if you had accepted the comment.

Original comment (issue 1157 [1]):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0013.html

As a response to your comment, the QA Working Group has accepted your  
comment and has added verbiage to new version of the ICS with
     - a comments column,
     - absolute links to the spec,
     - asking users to link back to the relevant spec parts. [2]:

     "The presentation is intended to be convenient     for  
organizers and evaluators of QA projects in
     W3C Working Groups, to facilitate assessing
     specifications against the checkpoints. The table
     includes spaces for scoring each checkpoint, "yes"
     (satisfied), "no" (not satisfied), "n/a" (not
     applicable), and comments.

     Users of this ICS are encouraged to put links in
     the comments column back to the reviewed specification
     parts illustrating how it conforms to the Specification
     Guidelines."


[0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/
[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1157
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/specgl-ics


-- 
Karl Dubost
QA Working Group Chair
http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 15:19:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:36 UTC