www-qa@w3.org from March 2003 by author

Al Gilman

• Re: DTD/Schema level of validity (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: list search is not working (Monday, 10 March)

Alex Rousskov

• Re: Notes on Last Call Issues for SpecGL (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Question concerning redirection (Friday, 7 March)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: DTD/Schema level of validity (Saturday, 29 March)

by way of the Lastcall Form

• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Definitions' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Section 3.4 - AAA-terminology useless' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Section 3.1 - Poor Defn of Normative' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'G3, G10, G11, G13' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Consolidate G11 with G3/G10' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Distributed conformance section OK' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Consolidate G3 and G10.' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Remove Checkpoint 9.6' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Don't discourage extensibility' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Awkward deprecation requirements' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Conformance levels' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Modules as extension points' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Priorities confusing' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Why is conformance policy a DoV?' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Loophole in Classes and Categories' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Classes vs. categories' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Examples vs. Illustrations' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Complexity of numbering' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Restructure DoV' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Consolidate glossary and terminology' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Reformat bullet list' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Abbreviations' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Spelling, grammar, and style' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Self-sufficient guidelines and checkpoints' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Group dimensions of variability' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Seven levels vs. Three' (Monday, 31 March)
• LC comment for OpsGL : 'OpsGL fails SpecGL checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3' (Wednesday, 19 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP9.6 conformance requirements and rationale may be too narrow.' (Wednesday, 19 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'SpecGL should address the topic of CP applicability.' (Wednesday, 19 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'SpecGL fails checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3' (Wednesday, 19 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Should provide a disclaimer template' (Wednesday, 19 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Collected substantive & editorial comments' (Wednesday, 19 March)
• LC comment for Intro : 'Collected substantive & editorial comments' (Wednesday, 19 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Comments on SpecGL Guidelines' (Sunday, 16 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Simplify & consolidate the guidelines of SpecGL' (Saturday, 15 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Collected substantive & editorial comments' (Saturday, 15 March)
• LC comment for OpsGL : 'Collected substantive & editorial comments' (Saturday, 15 March)
• LC comment for Intro : 'Collected substantive & editorial comments' (Saturday, 15 March)
• LC comment for OpsGL : 'Checklist format issue ' (Saturday, 15 March)
• LC comment for Intro : 'Several comments on various parts of Introduction' (Saturday, 15 March)
• LC comment for Intro : 'Intro draft' (Friday, 14 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'limits of RFC 2119 key words' (Friday, 14 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'edition and version DoVs' (Friday, 14 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'sentences and paragraphs (section 3.1)' (Friday, 14 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'conformance terms' (Friday, 14 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Table of Contents' (Friday, 14 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'typos' (Friday, 14 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'document product class' (Friday, 14 March)
• LC comment for OpsGL : 'Structure/Organization of Guidelines' (Friday, 14 March)
• LC comment for OpsGL : 'software license for style sheets' (Friday, 14 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Accessibility' (Thursday, 13 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Accessibility' (Thursday, 13 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'GLs 3, 10, 11, 12 and 13' (Thursday, 13 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Ambiguity' (Thursday, 13 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'NOT ?' (Thursday, 13 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'GLs 4, 5 and 6 ' (Thursday, 13 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Ambiguity or error?' (Thursday, 13 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Complexity in explanation' (Thursday, 13 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Categories of object not previously clearly defined' (Thursday, 13 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Spelling error in Example and Techniques' (Thursday, 13 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Ambiguity ' (Thursday, 13 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Design goal of guidelines' (Thursday, 13 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Grammatical errors' (Thursday, 13 March)
• LC comment for OpsGL : 'OpsGL Appendix 1 - Process Document Template' (Wednesday, 12 March)
• LC comment for OpsGL : 'Testability concerns' (Wednesday, 12 March)
• LC comment for OpsGL : 'Process Document requirement is too specific' (Wednesday, 12 March)
• LC comment for OpsGL : 'GL and timeline of a document' (Wednesday, 12 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : '4. Definitions' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : '4. Definitions' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Section 3.4 Conformance definition' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Section 3.2 Extensibility ' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Section 3.1 Normative sections' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP 9.3 ' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP 9.1 and 9.2 combine' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP 8.4 policies for discretionary choices' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'GL7 add obsolete features' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP 4.4 derived profile ' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'GL3: contradiction? regarding examples' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP 2.3 placement of Checkpoint' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP 1.4 vague' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Introduction, Sect 1.4' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Introduction: scope and goals' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Multiple CPs - It is not applicable' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Typos, grammar, etc.' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'document organization suggestions' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'questions and suggestions' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Profile, module, level' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'general' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Section 7' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'section 3.4 Conformance definition' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Section 3.3 Conformance and TAs' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP 14.1 - clarify conformance requirement' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'extensions' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP 8.4 clarify conformance requirement' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP 7.1 deprecated features' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'GL 5 non-hierarchiacal modules' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP 4.4 explanation clarification ' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP 3.1 Conformance Requirements - clarify' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP 2.4 - relationships of DOV - clarify' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'CK 2.3 Category of object: clarification' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Ck 2.2 list of classes' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Guideline 2, typo' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'Checkpoint 1.2' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'checkpoint 1.1' (Tuesday, 11 March)
• LC comment for SpecGL : 'INTRODUCTION section 1.1, second bullet' (Tuesday, 11 March)

Colleen Evans

• Comments on Last Call WD QA Framework: Introduction (Monday, 10 March)

David Marston/Cambridge/IBM

• My Notes on Last Call Issues for SpecGL (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: Comments on Last Call WD QA Framework: Specification Guidelines (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Observations about TestGL organization (Saturday, 8 March)

dimitris@ontologicon.com

• Re: Monday (24 Mar) QAWG telecon agenda (FINAL) (Wednesday, 26 March)

Dominique Hazaël-Massieux

• Minutes QA Working Group Teleconference 2003-03-24 (Monday, 31 March)
• Notes on Last Call Issues for SpecGL (Friday, 28 March)

JohnRobert Gardner

• Re: LC comment for SpecGL : 'CP 8.4 policies for discretionary choices' (Tuesday, 11 March)

Jonathan Marsh

• WS Description WG comments (coming) (Saturday, 15 March)

joy.fulton@altarum.org

• list search is not working (Monday, 10 March)

Karl Dubost

• DTD/Schema level of validity (Friday, 28 March)
• Dated Version of the QA glossary. (Tuesday, 25 March)
• HTML 4.01 analysis for conformance (Saturday, 22 March)

Lofton Henderson

• Reconciling multiple proposals [was Re: Observations about TestGL organization] (Monday, 10 March)

Lynne Rosenthal

• Monday (24 Mar) QAWG telecon agenda (FINAL) (Monday, 24 March)
• Minutes QA Working Group Teleconference 2003-02-24 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Minutes QA Working Group Teleconference 2003-02-24 (Tuesday, 4 March)

Marc Hadley

• Comments on Last Call WD QA Framework: Specification Guidelines (Monday, 10 March)

Olivier Thereaux

• "month in QA" for February 2003 (Wednesday, 12 March)

pankaj

• need help (Wednesday, 26 March)

Pavel Tikhonov

• Question concerning redirection (Thursday, 6 March)

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2003 14:22:20 UTC