W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > March 2003

LC comment for SpecGL : 'Ambiguity or error?'

From: by way of the Lastcall Form <steph@unadorned.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:57 +0900
To: www-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <20030313025718.4258165A@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>

Here is a last call comment from Stephanie Troeth (steph@unadorned.org) 
on QA Framework : Specifications Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques)
received by the LC form system.

Submitted on behalf of: N/A
Comment type: Editorial
The comment applies to: "4.1 Indicate whether or not the use of profiles is mandatory..."
Comment title: Ambiguity or error?

"For example, is content required to conform to one of the profiles, or is there a concept of conformance of content independent of conformance to one of the profiles?"

Ambiguity or error? (I count four 'of's in the second clause! :D)

Proposed resolution : 


This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system,
designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2003 21:57:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:31 UTC