W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > March 2003

LC comment for SpecGL : 'Table of Contents'

From: by way of the Lastcall Form <lesch@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 19:28 +0900
To: www-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <20030314102830.2D92F76C@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>

Here is a last call comment from Susan Lesch (lesch@w3.org) 
on QA Framework : Specifications Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques)
received by the LC form system.

Submitted on behalf of: N/A
Comment type: Editorial
The comment applies to: "Overall"
Comment title: Table of Contents

Would the table of contents in QA Framework specs that have guidelines be easier to follow if non-Guideline sections all appeared by number in the table of contents? E.g. "3. Conformance" could be followed by "3.1 Normative sections" rather than by "1. Normative sections"? The difference between for example "checkpoint 1.1" and "section 1.1" (both about scope) then would be distinct and easier to talk about.

Proposed resolution : 


This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system,
designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.
Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 05:28:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:31 UTC