W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > March 2003

LC comment for SpecGL : 'conformance terms'

From: by way of the Lastcall Form <lesch@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 19:31 +0900
To: www-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <20030314103150.C3E1176C@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>

Here is a last call comment from Susan Lesch (lesch@w3.org) 
on QA Framework : Specifications Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques)
received by the LC form system.

Submitted on behalf of: N/A
Comment type: Editorial
The comment applies to: "3.2 If special conformance terms are used, include a definition..."
Comment title: conformance terms

Comment:
Checkpoint 3.2 says: "the specification MUST be defined, either by reference or by including the definition in the text." Did you mean to say that the whole spec is considered to be "defined" through references and definitions? In that case, please ignore this comment.

Proposed resolution : 
Could read something like: "terms used to describe conformance MUST be defined, either by reference or by including the definition in the text." (I'm afraid "conformance terms..." might mean you'd have to define "terms.")
]]

-- 
This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system,
designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.
Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 05:31:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 12:13:59 GMT