W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > March 2003

LC comment for SpecGL : 'Consolidate G11 with G3/G10'

From: by way of the Lastcall Form <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 04:11 +0900
To: www-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <20030331191134.D95CF305@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>

Here is a last call comment from Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com) 
on QA Framework : Specifications Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques)
received by the LC form system.

Submitted on behalf of: WS Description WG
Comment type: Substantive
The comment applies to: "Guideline 11 Specify how to make conformance claims."
Comment title: Consolidate G11 with G3/G10

This is also still part of G3/G10.  This section should also discuss how one describes "module conformance" versus "profile conformance" versus "level conformance" versus "conforming extension", or how these might be combined.  Perhaps this information is in the examples (I haven't looked).

Proposed resolution : 
Consolidate G11 with G3/G10.  Clarify various conformance terminiology.

This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system,
designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.
Received on Monday, 31 March 2003 14:11:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:31 UTC