W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > March 2003

LC comment for OpsGL : 'OpsGL fails SpecGL checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3'

From: by way of the Lastcall Form <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 05:54 +0900
To: www-qa@w3.org
Message-Id: <20030319205425.429C24FE@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>

Here is a last call comment from Lofton Henderson (lofton@rockynet.com) 
on QA Framework : Operational Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques)
received by the LC form system.

Submitted on behalf of: N/A
Comment type: Substantive
The comment applies to: "Overall"
Comment title: OpsGL fails SpecGL checkpoints 1.2 and 1.3

[This is really a comment about the "Introduction" section.]

"Operational Guidelines" (OpsGL) fails Checkpoints 1.2 (priority 2) and 1.3 (priority 3) of "Specification Guidelines", by not illustrating its scope with examples and/or use cases, and not providing usage scenarios.


1.) Add examples and/or use cases, and provide usage scenarios;
2.) No need to, these are "not applicable" to OpsGL;
3.) No need to, OpsGL only needs to conform to itself at level "A-Conforming" (only priority 1 checkpoints).

While I believe that alternative #1 is the correct alternative, it might be helpful for OpsGL to explain its intentions about conformance (A or AA or AAA?) to SpecGL.  I.e., should OpsGL contain a SpecGL conformance claim?

Proposed resolution : 
Alternative #1.

This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system,
designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2003 15:54:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:31 UTC