public-i18n-cjk@w3.org from January to March 2012 by author

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 13113] Parsing algorithm should not preclude Complex Ruby (Monday, 20 February)
• [Bug 10829] Remove the whitespace from the <rp> example (Tuesday, 31 January)
• [Bug 10829] Remove the whitespace from the <rp> example (Tuesday, 31 January)
• [Bug 10830] i18n comment : Please add support for rb (Thursday, 5 January)

Eric Muller

• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 12 January)

fantasai

• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Wednesday, 18 January)

Glenn Adams

• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Wednesday, 18 January)

IKEDA Soji

• [jlreq] Comment to WD-20111129 (Sunday, 5 February)

Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

• [css3-ui] 'ime-mode' feedback (Thursday, 16 February)

KOBAYASHI Tatsuo(FAMILY Given)

• Re: [jlreq] Comment to WD-20111129 (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: [jlreq] Comment to WD-20111129 (Monday, 6 February)

Koji Ishii

• RE: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Monday, 20 February)
• Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Saturday, 18 February)
• RE: Fullwidth parens for rp ? (Thursday, 16 February)
• RE: [jlreq] Comment to WD-20111129 (Monday, 6 February)
• RE: Examples of double-sided ruby (was RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 2 February)
• RE: Examples of double-sided ruby (was RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: FW: ruby and rb tag (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Examples of double-sided ruby (was RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Better ruby rendering (was RE: Examples of double-sided ruby (was RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Wednesday, 25 January)
• FW: ruby and rb tag (Wednesday, 25 January)
• FW: ruby and rb tag (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Examples of double-sided ruby (was RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Tuesday, 24 January)
• RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Tuesday, 24 January)
• RE: Planning to update the IncludeRB change proposal [Was: Letter-by-letter (or syllable-by-syllable) (was RE: HTML5 and ruby] (Monday, 23 January)
• RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Sunday, 22 January)
• RE: Implying rb for accessibility (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Sunday, 22 January)
• RE: Implying rb for accessibility (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Sunday, 22 January)
• Letter-by-letter (or syllable-by-syllable) (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Saturday, 21 January)
• Implying rb for accessibility (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Saturday, 21 January)
• Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Saturday, 21 January)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: Arguments against HTML double-sided ruby (was: Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Arguments against HTML double-sided ruby (was: Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Arguments against HTML double-sided ruby (was: Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Thursday, 23 February)
• RE: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Examples of double-sided ruby (was RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: FW: ruby and rb tag (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: FW: ruby and rb tag (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Re: Examples of double-sided ruby (was RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Planning to update the IncludeRB change proposal [Was: Letter-by-letter (or syllable-by-syllable) (was RE: HTML5 and ruby] (Monday, 23 January)
• Planning to update the IncludeRB change proposal [Was: Letter-by-letter (or syllable-by-syllable) (was RE: HTML5 and ruby] (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Implying rb for accessibility (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Monday, 23 January)
• RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Monday, 23 January)
• RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Sunday, 22 January)
• Re: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Sunday, 22 January)
• Re: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Sunday, 22 January)
• RE: Implying rb for accessibility (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Sunday, 22 January)
• Re: Letter-by-letter (or syllable-by-syllable) (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: Implying rb for accessibility (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 12 January)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: Arguments against HTML double-sided ruby (was: Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Fullwidth parens for rp ? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Implying rb for accessibility (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: Implying rb for accessibility (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Monday, 23 January)
• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 19 January)
• Re: HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 19 January)

MURATA Makoto

• Re: Arguments against HTML double-sided ruby (was: Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Arguments against HTML double-sided ruby (was: Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland) (Thursday, 23 February)
• Arguments against HTML double-sided ruby (was: Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland) (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Desiderata for automatic layout of double-sided ruby (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Examples of double-sided ruby (was RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Examples of double-sided ruby (was RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 16 February)

Richard Ishida

• Fullwidth parens for rp ? (Wednesday, 15 February)
• HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 12 January)

Roland Steiner

• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Memo from ruby disucssion with Roland (Wednesday, 22 February)

Taro Yamamoto

• RE: Examples of double-sided ruby (was RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Examples of double-sided ruby (was RE: Feedback for rb from html5j.org (was RE: HTML5 and ruby (Wednesday, 25 January)

Last message date: Wednesday, 29 February 2012 16:18:42 UTC