W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-cjk@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Implying rb for accessibility (was RE: HTML5 and ruby

From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:21:23 +0900
Message-ID: <4F1CD233.3070403@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
CC: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, "CJK discussion (public-i18n-cjk@w3.org)" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
On 2012/01/23 11:17, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:

> I therefore hope that you at leas agree that the examples in the HTML5
> spec should be changed to demonstrate use of<rb>. Because, after all,
> we believe there is benefit in using it. If we don't demonstrate that
> we believe in<rb>, then the Chairs get the impression that is not very
> controversial to not include it.

Using <rb> in most of the examples, and adding examples where <rb> shows 
its advantages, is definitely a good idea. But that's separate from 
making <rb> required in all cases.

Regards,    Martin.
Received on Monday, 23 January 2012 03:22:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 January 2012 03:22:02 GMT