W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-cjk@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: HTML5 and ruby

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:12:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dByUJQve2MvW8VtkVNGC+tG4Q+oDYi39KE-oKabs9hZw@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: public-i18n-cjk@w3.org, WWW International <www-international@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:30 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>wrote:

> On 01/12/2012 07:53 AM, Richard Ishida wrote:
>
>> Ian Hickson, the HTML5 editor, is waiting for us to make some clear
>> recommendations about whether rb is needed for simple ruby
>> markup, and how to approach complex ruby support.
>> Here are some key questions:
>>
>> 1. do we need rb for simple ruby, or will span suffice? (take into
>> account the use case related to fallback)
>>
>> 2. do we need rb and rtc for complex ruby support, or is it sufficient to
>> rely on a mixture of recursive ruby markup plus a
>> second <rt> element (depending on the use case)?
>>
>
> I think the inclusion of <rb> allows solving all the use cases in
> a consistent and extendable way


+1 for inclusion of <rb>
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 18:13:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 18 January 2012 18:13:43 GMT