On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 20:29, Leif Halvard Silli < xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: > [...] And hopefully most ruby out there are such single-column-major ruby? If authors have > looked at what XHTML allows, then one should thing: yes. > I fear that is an optimistic assumption - rather than looking at XHTML I suspect authors have pragmatically looked at what works in browsers. And with IE having been the only browser with a <ruby> implementation for a long time (not to mention market share), I suspect most content to target that. But I admit I don't have hard data on this, either. > Secondly: Since it is only a stylistic issue, then *do* Webkit or > Firefox actually render the latter example in jukugo *style*? Doesn't > look like so, to me — but note that I had not time to do a thorough > check before posting this reply. > WebKit at least only has rudimentary support for ruby overhang and - by extension - Jukugo rendering at the moment. There certainly is room for improvement. Cheers, - RolandReceived on Friday, 24 February 2012 06:18:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 24 February 2012 06:18:09 GMT