public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from April 2015 by author

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 23 April 2015 (Thursday, 30 April)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 30 April 2015 (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Language Tags Requirement (Friday, 24 April)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 23 April 2015 (Friday, 24 April)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 23 April 2015 (Wednesday, 22 April)
• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-35 per Jose's suggestion (Friday, 17 April)
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 16 April 2015 (Thursday, 16 April)
• SHACL Use Cases and Requirements FPWD (Wednesday, 15 April)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 16 April 2015 (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 2 April 2015 (Friday, 10 April)
• RDF Data Shapes WG mintues for 9 April 2015 (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 9 April 2015 (Wednesday, 8 April)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 9 April 2015 (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 2 April 2015 (Wednesday, 8 April)
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 2 April 2015 (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Considering turning the F2F3 into a virtual meeting (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Compilation of WG resolutions (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: Compilation of WG resolutions (Saturday, 4 April)
• Compilation of WG resolutions (Friday, 3 April)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 2 April 2015 (Wednesday, 1 April)
• RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 26 March 2015 (Wednesday, 1 April)

Arthur Ryman

• Re: vote for supporting "closed shapes" (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 23 April 2015 (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: Comments on Shacl-sparql Specification (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Regrets for 2015-04-30 Telecon (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Errors/Typos in Shacl-Sparql Spec. (Monday, 27 April)
• Editorial Comments on Shacl-Sparql Spec (Monday, 27 April)
• Comments on Shacl-sparql Specification (Monday, 27 April)
• User Story S40 Updated (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-35 per Jose's suggestion (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-44 (Graph dependencies): How to express dependencies between graphs [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 16 April 2015 (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-44 (Graph dependencies): How to express dependencies between graphs [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-44 (Graph dependencies): How to express dependencies between graphs [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 16 April)
• Incorrect W3C Team Comment links in ShEx Member Submission (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: ACTION-18 S40 Describing Inline Content versus References (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-31 (unitary semantics): Is there going to be a single unitary semantics for all of SHACL [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-43 (SHACL-Part-1-FPWD): Proposal for creating the FPWD of SHACL Part 1 [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: Proposal for creating the FPWD of SHACL Part 1 (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Proposal for creating the FPWD of SHACL Part 1 (Thursday, 9 April)
• ACTION-18 S40 Describing Inline Content versus References (Thursday, 9 April)
• Proposal for creating the FPWD of SHACL Part 1 (Thursday, 9 April)
• S40 Describing Inline Content versus References (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 2 April 2015 (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 2 April 2015 (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-27 (extensions-in-highlevel): Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Z Errors in Shape Expressions 1.0 Definition (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Z Errors in Shape Expressions 1.0 Definition (Monday, 6 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-27 (extensions-in-highlevel): Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-31 (unitary semantics): Is there going to be a single unitary semantics for all of SHACL [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-24 (specialisation): Can shapes specialise other shapes? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-29 (formalism): Formalism for definition of high-level language [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-28 (macros): Is the macro facility part of the high-level language or of the extension mechanism? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-27 (extensions-in-highlevel): Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-22 (recursion): Treatment of recursive shape definitions [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL (Wednesday, 1 April)

Axel Polleres

• European Data Forum (EDF 2015) - 2nd Call for contributions: Deadline 15 May 2015 (Tuesday, 7 April)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: Regrets for 2015-04-30 Telecon (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A proposal to not mingle shapes and classes (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: Test cases format (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: Test cases format (Thursday, 2 April)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: vote for supporting "closed shapes" (Wednesday, 29 April)

Holger Knublauch

• Question on closed shapes (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A proposal to not mingle shapes and classes (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Sunday, 26 April)
• Re: Language Tags Requirement (Sunday, 26 April)
• Re: Language Tags Requirement (Saturday, 25 April)
• Re: Constraints on classes (Saturday, 25 April)
• Re: Constraints on classes (Saturday, 25 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Saturday, 25 April)
• Re: Language Tags Requirement (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Friday, 24 April)
• ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: proposal for SHACL based on SPARQL (Thursday, 23 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-46 (RDF lists): Support for RDF Collections? [Requirements] (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-45 (SPARQL-extension): Should SPARQL be a built-in extension language [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 19 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-45 (SPARQL-extension): Should SPARQL be a built-in extension language [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 19 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-45 (SPARQL-extension): Should SPARQL be a built-in extension language [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-29 (formalism): Formalism for definition of high-level language [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 16 April)
• Fwd: Re: ShEx questionnaire (was Re: RDF validation questionnaire) (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-44 (Graph dependencies): How to express dependencies between graphs [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-44 (Graph dependencies): How to express dependencies between graphs [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 16 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-44 (Graph dependencies): How to express dependencies between graphs [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-44 (Graph dependencies): How to express dependencies between graphs [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-36 (Value type facet): Naming of value type facet [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 14 April)
• ISSUE-1: Inferencing and current databases (Monday, 13 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 13 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-43 (SHACL-Part-1-FPWD): Proposal for creating the FPWD of SHACL Part 1 [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-43 (SHACL-Part-1-FPWD): Proposal for creating the FPWD of SHACL Part 1 [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 9 April 2015 (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-39 (Value shape facet): Naming of value shape facet [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-38 (Cardinality facet): Naming of cardinality facets [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Splitting Part 1 and Part 2 in TOC (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-40 (Property Cardinality): sh:min/max constrains properties, not values (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-40 (Property Cardinality): sh:min/max constrains properties, not values (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Splitting Part 1 and Part 2 in TOC (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-38 (Cardinality facet): Naming of cardinality facets [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-36 (Value type facet): Naming of value type facet [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-27 (extensions-in-highlevel): Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: Splitting Part 1 and Part 2 in TOC (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-36 (Value type facet): Naming of value type facet [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-27 (extensions-in-highlevel): Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: Splitting Part 1 and Part 2 in TOC (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-33 (Simonstey): Shifting section "Shape Selection" to introduction? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: Test cases format (Thursday, 2 April)
• Test cases format (Thursday, 2 April)
• Splitting Part 1 and Part 2 in TOC (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-33 (Simonstey): Shifting section "Shape Selection" to introduction? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: Some remarks on the draft Primer doc (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 2 April 2015 (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: Ditching the Constraint Violation Vocabulary (Wednesday, 1 April)

Iovka Boneva

• Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL (Wednesday, 1 April)

Irene Polikoff

• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Constraints on classes (Sunday, 26 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-39 (Value shape facet): Naming of value shape facet [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 5 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-27 (extensions-in-highlevel): Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-39 (Value shape facet): Naming of value shape facet [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-27 (extensions-in-highlevel): Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 4 April)

Jerven Tjalling Bolleman

• Static Analysis of SHACL [Was Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL] (Wednesday, 1 April)

Jose Emilio Labra Gayo

• Re: Language Tags Requirement (Sunday, 26 April)
• Re: Language Tags Requirement (Saturday, 25 April)
• Re: Constraints on classes (Friday, 24 April)
• Language Tags Requirement (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Test cases format (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: Test cases format (Thursday, 2 April)

Karen Coyle

• Re: ISSUE-23: sh:ShapeClass? (Thursday, 30 April)
• DCMI requirements (Sunday, 26 April)
• Re: Language Tags Requirement (Sunday, 26 April)
• Re: Language Tags Requirement (Sunday, 26 April)
• Re: Constraints on classes (Saturday, 25 April)
• Re: Constraints on classes (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Constraints on classes (Friday, 24 April)
• Constraints on classes (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-45 (SPARQL-extension): Should SPARQL be a built-in extension language [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-45 (SPARQL-extension): Should SPARQL be a built-in extension language [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 13 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 11 April)
• Re: ACTION-18 S40 Describing Inline Content versus References (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-29 (formalism): Formalism for definition of high-level language [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: S40 Describing Inline Content versus References (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Proposal for creating the FPWD of SHACL Part 1 (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Considering turning the F2F3 into a virtual meeting (Wednesday, 8 April)
• Re: Splitting Part 1 and Part 2 in TOC (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-40 (Property Cardinality): sh:min/max constrains properties, not values (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-40 (Property Cardinality): sh:min/max constrains properties, not values (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-40 (Property Cardinality): sh:min/max constrains properties, not values (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Splitting Part 1 and Part 2 in TOC (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-38 (Cardinality facet): Naming of cardinality facets [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Splitting Part 1 and Part 2 in TOC (Sunday, 5 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-38 (Cardinality facet): Naming of cardinality facets [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-39 (Value shape facet): Naming of value shape facet [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-27 (extensions-in-highlevel): Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-27 (extensions-in-highlevel): Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-39 (Value shape facet): Naming of value shape facet [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-36 (Value type facet): Naming of value type facet [SHACL Spec] (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-36 (Value type facet): Naming of value type facet [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: Splitting Part 1 and Part 2 in TOC (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: Splitting Part 1 and Part 2 in TOC (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-32 (SHACL+-): SHACL = high-level + extensions ? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-33 (shape selection): Shifting section "Shape Selection" to introduction? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 1 April)

Michel Dumontier

• Re: ISSUE-23: A proposal to not mingle shapes and classes (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A proposal to not mingle shapes and classes (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Sunday, 26 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Sunday, 26 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Sunday, 26 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Saturday, 25 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Friday, 24 April)

Paul Hermans

• Some remarks on the draft Primer doc (Wednesday, 1 April)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 30 April 2015 (Wednesday, 29 April)
• ISSUE-23: A proposal to not mingle shapes and classes (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Comments on Shacl-sparql Specification (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: Editorial Comments on Shacl-Sparql Spec (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: Errors/Typos in Shacl-Sparql Spec. (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Monday, 27 April)
• Re: Constraints on classes (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: Constraints on classes (Friday, 24 April)
• Re: proposal for SHACL based on SPARQL (Wednesday, 22 April)
• proposal for SHACL based on SPARQL (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-44 (Graph dependencies): How to express dependencies between graphs [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 14 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 13 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 13 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-29 (formalism): Formalism for definition of high-level language [SHACL Spec] (Sunday, 12 April)
• Re: ACTION-18 S40 Describing Inline Content versus References (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: ACTION-18 S40 Describing Inline Content versus References (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-31 (unitary semantics): Is there going to be a single unitary semantics for all of SHACL [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-43 (SHACL-Part-1-FPWD): Proposal for creating the FPWD of SHACL Part 1 [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-29 (formalism): Formalism for definition of high-level language [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 10 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-31 (unitary semantics): Is there going to be a single unitary semantics for all of SHACL [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-43 (SHACL-Part-1-FPWD): Proposal for creating the FPWD of SHACL Part 1 [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: ACTION-18 S40 Describing Inline Content versus References (Thursday, 9 April)
• SPARQL in SHACL (was Re: shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec]) (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• Re: Z Errors in Shape Expressions 1.0 Definition (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Compilation of WG resolutions (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: Compilation of WG resolutions (Saturday, 4 April)
• Re: Compilation of WG resolutions (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-22 (recursion): Treatment of recursive shape definitions [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• asymmetrical WG fare (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-32 (SHACL+-): SHACL = high-level + extensions ? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-33 (shape selection): Shifting section "Shape Selection" to introduction? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 1 April)
• Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL (Wednesday, 1 April)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

• shapes-ISSUE-48 (scope-of-shape): How do we limit the scope for a shape? [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 28 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-47 (sparqling-shape-graph): Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 23 April)
• shapes-ACTION-20: Update description of 2.6.11 expressivity: closed shapes to address concerns expressed to date (Thursday, 23 April)
• shapes-ACTION-19: Add requirement(s) for rdf collections to address issue-4 (Thursday, 23 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-46 (RDF lists): Support for RDF Collections? [Requirements] (Wednesday, 22 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-45 (SPARQL-extension): Should SPARQL be a built-in extension language [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 17 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-44 (Graph dependencies): How to express dependencies between graphs [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 15 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-43 (SHACL-Part-1-FPWD): Proposal for creating the FPWD of SHACL Part 1 [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 9 April)
• shapes-ACTION-18: Advance discussion of s40 by 16 april 2015 (Thursday, 9 April)
• shapes-ACTION-17: Publish the ucr by 14 april 2015 (Thursday, 9 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-42 (sh:notEqual): Adding sh:notEqual to potential datatype properties? [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 7 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 7 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-40 (Property Cardinality): sh:min/max constrains properties, not values (Sunday, 5 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-39 (Value shape facet): Naming of value shape facet [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-38 (Cardinality facet): Naming of cardinality facets [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-37 (Node kind facet): Naming of node kind facet [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-36 (Value type facet): Naming of value type facet [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-35 (labra): Language-tags [Requirements] (Thursday, 2 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• shapes-ISSUE-33 (Simonstey): Shifting section "Shape Selection" to introduction? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 1 April)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 3 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-27 (extensions-in-highlevel): Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL (Wednesday, 1 April)

Simon Steyskal

• Re: Regrets for 2015-04-30 Telecon (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: ISSUE-23: A specific proposal (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-35 per Jose's suggestion (Saturday, 18 April)
• Re: Connection Issues (Friday, 17 April)
• Connection Issues (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-45 (SPARQL-extension): Should SPARQL be a built-in extension language [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-44 (Graph dependencies): How to express dependencies between graphs [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-44 (Graph dependencies): How to express dependencies between graphs [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 15 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-38 (Cardinality facet): Naming of cardinality facets [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: Splitting Part 1 and Part 2 in TOC (Tuesday, 7 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-33 (Simonstey): Shifting section "Shape Selection" to introduction? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 2 April)

Solbrig, Harold R.

• Re: Considering turning the F2F3 into a virtual meeting (Thursday, 9 April)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: vote for supporting "closed shapes" (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: proposal for SHACL based on SPARQL (Wednesday, 22 April)
• Re: RDF validation questionnaire (Thursday, 16 April)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 April 2015 23:48:05 UTC