- From: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:33:21 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
On Apr 17, 2015, at 03:23 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> I light of
>
> http://www.w3.org/2015/04/16-shapes-minutes.html#resolution03
> RESOLUTION: All proposals to be considered should be in decent shape by the
> end of the month (30 April) or will be dropped
>
> I updated my proposal for a SHACL based on SPARQL at
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Shacl-sparql
>
>
> I welcome questions and suggestions for improvement.
>
> peter
"Several SHACL accepted requirements cannot be handled in
SPARQL and so are not in this proposal for SHACL."
Enumerating these would make informed consideration of this
proposal much less challenging.
Thanks,
Ted
--
A: Yes. http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Ted Thibodeau, Jr. // voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Senior Support & Evangelism // mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
// http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/
10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
Weblog -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
Twitter -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
Google+ -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 20:33:52 UTC