- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 11:52:34 +1000
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
On 4/9/2015 10:49, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Well, at least we have a proposal for an extension mechanism. > > Whether it is something that the WG will endorse and whether it is elegant > are less clear. Unless we want to turn in infinite circles we should officially approve or reject the ability to embed SPARQL queries as constraints as soon as possible. Without such a decision, how could we even decide what goes into the core high-level language? Or shall we pre-emptively reinvent our own SPARQL variant just in case the real SPARQL doesn't make it into the standard?! Holger
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2015 01:53:58 UTC