- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 12:33:55 -0700
- To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I would be much more sympathetic to the anti-SPARQL position if there was a non-SPARQL proposal for SPARCL that could be considered. peter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVHZmiAAoJECjN6+QThfjzjZEIALC+lFqAtnKwKI+rmdJcL+qI H7ktyNPS13Ui+iW+865Ag+VBcdJe7k75wEnNNZ7qoW/0EaIKfC893atI4g8tba4a ZHbcE3Rs0G8G5YuKGsDLCw0R+DU2BePPkHivQGvzO25b1eSzxKSJYdnCEodKMYxi L9GAdwwPW78LwEM0cpbGBJZ+Dt298474l/s3aiehNZPwJV0E3fH3JADqn1CEYLnJ LY8uHzeuAXvd+hqgNOYXc7UFIVx7lbhBCrweijaMlQTwrRUVCzsB1YG+Bzn0j6Nz AahXiTXZHBmeBfEp4L3SUf8cuURbAnx/M3Zsr+R2CW2z93jvop4YtUs9omh1Erg= =Z3Ry -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2015 19:34:24 UTC