- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:04:07 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
+1 On 4/13/15 7:34 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > I would put this exactly the other way around, namely > > I believe that it should be doable to assume that - in the context of the > spec - the shapes graph can be completely separate from the actual data. So > validation has two parameters: > - the "instances" data graph > - the shapes graph > > I believe that this setup is much cleaner than a design that*needs* to do > something special when the shapes graph is inaccessible from the data graph. > In this setup special things*can* but do*not* need to be done when the > shapes graph is accessible from the data graph. > > [...] > >> >Regards, Holger > peter -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Monday, 13 April 2015 15:04:37 UTC