public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from April 2015 by thread

Question on closed shapes Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 30 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 30 April 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 29 April)

Re: vote for supporting "closed shapes" Eric Prud'hommeaux (Wednesday, 29 April)

ISSUE-23: A proposal to not mingle shapes and classes Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 29 April)

Regrets for 2015-04-30 Telecon Arthur Ryman (Tuesday, 28 April)

shapes-ISSUE-48 (scope-of-shape): How do we limit the scope for a shape? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 28 April)

Errors/Typos in Shacl-Sparql Spec. Arthur Ryman (Monday, 27 April)

Editorial Comments on Shacl-Sparql Spec Arthur Ryman (Monday, 27 April)

Comments on Shacl-sparql Specification Arthur Ryman (Monday, 27 April)

DCMI requirements Karen Coyle (Sunday, 26 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 23 April 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 24 April)

Constraints on classes Karen Coyle (Friday, 24 April)

Language Tags Requirement Jose Emilio Labra Gayo (Friday, 24 April)

ISSUE-23: A specific proposal Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 23 April)

User Story S40 Updated Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 23 April)

shapes-ISSUE-47 (sparqling-shape-graph): Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 23 April)

shapes-ACTION-20: Update description of 2.6.11 expressivity: closed shapes to address concerns expressed to date RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 23 April)

shapes-ACTION-19: Add requirement(s) for rdf collections to address issue-4 RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 23 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 23 April 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 22 April)

shapes-ISSUE-46 (RDF lists): Support for RDF Collections? [Requirements] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 22 April)

PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-35 per Jose's suggestion Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 17 April)

Connection Issues Simon Steyskal (Friday, 17 April)

proposal for SHACL based on SPARQL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 17 April)

shapes-ISSUE-45 (SPARQL-extension): Should SPARQL be a built-in extension language [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 17 April)

Fwd: Re: ShEx questionnaire (was Re: RDF validation questionnaire) Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 16 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 16 April 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 16 April)

Re: RDF validation questionnaire Ted Thibodeau Jr (Thursday, 16 April)

SHACL Use Cases and Requirements FPWD Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 15 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 16 April 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 15 April)

shapes-ISSUE-44 (Graph dependencies): How to express dependencies between graphs [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 15 April)

ISSUE-1: Inferencing and current databases Holger Knublauch (Monday, 13 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG mintues for 9 April 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 10 April)

Incorrect W3C Team Comment links in ShEx Member Submission Arthur Ryman (Friday, 10 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-29 (formalism): Formalism for definition of high-level language [SHACL Spec] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 10 April)

shapes-ISSUE-43 (SHACL-Part-1-FPWD): Proposal for creating the FPWD of SHACL Part 1 [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 9 April)

ACTION-18 S40 Describing Inline Content versus References Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 9 April)

Proposal for creating the FPWD of SHACL Part 1 Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 9 April)

S40 Describing Inline Content versus References Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 9 April)

shapes-ACTION-18: Advance discussion of s40 by 16 april 2015 RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 9 April)

shapes-ACTION-17: Publish the ucr by 14 april 2015 RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 9 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] Dimitris Kontokostas (Thursday, 9 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 9 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 9 April 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 8 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 2 April 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 8 April)

European Data Forum (EDF 2015) - 2nd Call for contributions: Deadline 15 May 2015 Axel Polleres (Tuesday, 7 April)

Considering turning the F2F3 into a virtual meeting Arnaud Le Hors (Tuesday, 7 April)

shapes-ISSUE-42 (sh:notEqual): Adding sh:notEqual to potential datatype properties? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 7 April)

shapes-ISSUE-41 (property paths (sh:path?)): Using property paths to refer to values/types? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 7 April)

Re: Z Errors in Shape Expressions 1.0 Definition Arthur Ryman (Monday, 6 April)

shapes-ISSUE-40 (Property Cardinality): sh:min/max constrains properties, not values RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Sunday, 5 April)

Compilation of WG resolutions Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 3 April)

shapes-ISSUE-39 (Value shape facet): Naming of value shape facet [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 2 April)

shapes-ISSUE-38 (Cardinality facet): Naming of cardinality facets [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 2 April)

shapes-ISSUE-37 (Node kind facet): Naming of node kind facet [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 2 April)

shapes-ISSUE-36 (Value type facet): Naming of value type facet [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 2 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-31 (unitary semantics): Is there going to be a single unitary semantics for all of SHACL [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 2 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-24 (specialisation): Can shapes specialise other shapes? [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 2 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-29 (formalism): Formalism for definition of high-level language [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 2 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-28 (macros): Is the macro facility part of the high-level language or of the extension mechanism? [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 2 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-27 (extensions-in-highlevel): Can extension constraints be used in the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 2 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-26 (invoke-highlevel): Can extensions invoke the high-level language? [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 2 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-23 (punning): Shapes, classes and punning [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 2 April)

shapes-ISSUE-35 (labra): Language-tags [Requirements] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 2 April)

asymmetrical WG fare Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 2 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-22 (recursion): Treatment of recursive shape definitions [SHACL Spec] Arthur Ryman (Thursday, 2 April)

shapes-ISSUE-34 (OrConstraint): 2 disjuncts at a time in sh:OrConstraint [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 2 April)

Test cases format Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 2 April)

Splitting Part 1 and Part 2 in TOC Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 2 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-32 (SHACL+-): SHACL = high-level + extensions ? [SHACL Spec] Karen Coyle (Wednesday, 1 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 2 April 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 1 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 26 March 2015 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 1 April)

shapes-ISSUE-33 (Simonstey): Shifting section "Shape Selection" to introduction? [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 1 April)

Some remarks on the draft Primer doc Paul Hermans (Wednesday, 1 April)

Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL Iovka Boneva (Wednesday, 1 April)

Re: Ditching the Constraint Violation Vocabulary Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 1 April)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 April 2015 23:48:05 UTC