some comments on an SCXML draft
Comments sent from i18n WG on PLS
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Variant id suggestion for TTS homograph disambiguation
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Bias in 5.5
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Phonemic examples
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Not easy in ASR
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Smyth
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Section 5.3
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Sub-elements for example
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Transformation ?
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Problems with 4.5 japanese example
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Why orthography attribute?
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: TTS vs. ASR in 4.5
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Japanese mixtures
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Name of grapheme element
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: it-IT
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: English in italian lexicon
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: dc:language
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: 3066 or its successor
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Why one lexicon per language?
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Alphabet on lexicon is default
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Meta data container element
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Styling for MUST, SHOULD, etc
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Point to IPA picker
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: IPAHNDBK alternative ?
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Definition of orthography
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: s/then/than/
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Show simple PLS doc in intro
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Quotes missing
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Add lang="it"
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Incorrect accent on italian text
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: TTS or ASR?
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Alternate IPA characters ' and :
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: encoding=utf8
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Text out of synch with schema
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Embeddable in other formats?
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Use characters rather than escapes in code
[PLS1.0] i18n comment: Possible to choose language specific lexicon?
Thesis on say-as values
Summary Voice Browser Working Group Meeting in Mandelieu, France February 28-March 3, 2006
<record> tag behaviour
Second W3C Workshop on Internationalizing the Speech Synthesis Markup Language (SSML) (Call for Participation)
comment for PLS Last Call
SCXML specifications
FYI use case for semantic clarifications in Voice Browser Aps [was: SKOS? and auto-translation ]
comments on SCXML W3C Working Draft 24 January 2006
RE: Comments on "Authorizing Read Access to XML Content Using the <?access-control?> Processing Instruction 1.0"
<?access-control?> allows privelege escalation attacks with many embedding mechanisms
- Re: <?access-control?> allows privelege escalation attacks with many embedding mechanisms
- Re: <?access-control?> allows privelege escalation attacks with many embedding mechanisms