- From: <raxit@phonologies.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:39:24 +0530
- To: www-voice@w3.org
Reference SCXML Draft : 2006-01-24 http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-scxml-20060124/ Issue 1: As per the 4.4.2 "<invoke> is incompatible with the <state> and <parallel> elements. It may thus occur only in atomic states, namely those which do not have substates." Conficting with 4.4 "For the niceties of the semantics of <invoke>, consider the case when parallel states invoke the same external service concurrently." Issue 2 : ID attribute of <state> As per 4.4 "They can be distingused by the states' "id" which is passed with the invocation. Similarly, the "id" contained in the events returned from the external services can be used to determine which events are responses to which invocation." what if the <state> is not having ID. ? (As per the 3.2.1 and 3.4.1 ID is not required attribute) From the platform implementation point of View Each state must have Valid (and unique) ID (as per the scope semantics), However when SCXML Application not having id attribute of <state> , platform should be responsible for generating (and maintaining) Valid-Unique ID. Not having ID attribute is only for ease of SCXML application developer. Waiting for response... Thanking you, Regards Raxit Sheth -- Raxit Sheth Systems Software Engineer Raxit@Phonologies.com *********************** Please note our new Address. *********************** Phonologies (India) Private Limited 17/18 Metro House, Colaba Causeway, Mumbai 400001. INDIA. Ph:+91-22-22029732 / 36 Fax:+91-22-22029728 Info@Phonologies.COM http://www.phonologies.com ****The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful****
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2006 06:11:44 UTC