- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:17:26 +0100
- To: "Matt Oshry" <matto@tellme.com>
- Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>
* Matt Oshry wrote: >The VBWG has decided to defer formal specification of the expected >behavior to a future version of the specification. The purpose of >VoiceXML 2.1 is to formally define a small set of features commonly used >throughout the industry while maintaining complete backwards >compatibility with VoiceXML 2.0. Clarification of 111-15 does not meet >those criteria. That's irrelevant since VoiceXML 2.1 inherits the problem from VoiceXML 2.0 which the Working Group is required to maintain. Why are there no entries in <http://www.w3.org/2004/03/voicexml20-errata.html>? Is this issue the first problem with VoiceXML 2.0 the Working Group has become aware of? It seems VoiceXML 2.1 can only be implemented by ignoring authoriative meta data, I don't think that's acceptable. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 12:23:12 UTC