Re: 111-20: VoiceXML 2.1: .js script extension

* Matt Oshry wrote:
>The VBWG does not consider the file extension to be significant enough
>to warrant changing the VoiceXML 2.1 specification at this stage in its

Please cite technical rationale for this decision, I don't see how the
maturity of the document may be in any way relevant to the issue.
Björn Höhrmann · ·
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 ·
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · 

Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 12:38:31 UTC