Friday, 30 August 2002
Saturday, 31 August 2002
Thursday, 29 August 2002
Wednesday, 28 August 2002
- RE: Suggestion for a new XML based pixel graphics format, called PPG (portable pixel graphics)
- Batik 1.5beta4 available
- Re: XForms 3.2.2 Linking Attributes
Tuesday, 27 August 2002
- Re: XForms 3.2.2 Linking Attributes
- RE: *****SPAM***** Suggestion for a new XML based pixel graphics format, called PPG (portable pixel graphics)
- Re:%20Suggestion%20for%20a%20new%20XML%20based%20pixel%20graphics%20format,%20called%20PPG%20%20(portable%20pixel%20graphics)&I
- Suggestion for a new XML based pixel graphics format, called PPG (portable pixel graphics)
Friday, 23 August 2002
- Re: foreignObject
- RE: foreignObject
- Re: foreignObject
- RE: foreignObject
- Re: Conformance Suite Implementation Status: update? more players/viewers/browsers?
- Re: Conformance Suite Implementation Status: update? more players/viewers/browsers?
- Re: foreignObject
- foreignObject
- Re: Conformance Suite Implementation Status: update? more players/viewers/browsers?
- Re: Conformance Suite Implementation Status: update? more players/viewers/browsers?
Thursday, 22 August 2002
- Conformance Suite Implementation Status: update? more players/viewers/browsers?
- RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- Re: SVG/XForms Profile - Status?
- RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- Re: SVG/XForms Profile - Status?
- Re: [svg-developers] SVG/XForms Profile - Status?
- Re: SVG/XForms Profile - Status?
- Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- Re: SVG/XForms Profile - Status?
- Re: [svg-developers] SVG/XForms Profile - Status?
- AW: AW: AW: [ANN] SVG-Mobile Mailing List
- Re: AW: AW: [ANN] SVG-Mobile Mailing List
- SVG/XForms Profile - Status?
Tuesday, 20 August 2002
- RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- Re: Minutes 20 August 2002
- Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- Minutes 20 August 2002
- RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- Re: A little thing about use... (was Re: svg textLength issue ... )
- A little thing about use... (was Re: svg textLength issue ... )
- Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion
- proposal for this link/tspan discussion
Monday, 19 August 2002
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- RE: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- RE: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- RE: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
Saturday, 17 August 2002
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
- [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor?
Friday, 16 August 2002
- SVG 1.1 DTD error in spec....A.1.3 Qualified Name Module in Section B
- Re: svg textLength issue (and a little thing about use...)
- Re: svg textLength issue (and a little thing about use...)
- svg textLength issue (and a little thing about use...)
Thursday, 15 August 2002
Wednesday, 14 August 2002
- Re: [svg-developers] Re: English Please--help understanding SVG 1.1 section 1.1.2
- Call for gorgeous SVG slide templates; SlideML and SVG
- Re: [svg-developers] Re: English Please--help understanding SVG 1.1 section 1.1.2
Tuesday, 13 August 2002
- Could the SVG Working Group Please Explain PresentationtAttrsAll
- SVG 1.1 : There are some svg elements that are not in acontent set ..Why?
- Possible error in spec 1.1 -missing feature string ?
- Title: SVG 1.1 Why are there some modules not in the specification?
- Editorial error in 11.9 Paint Attribute Module
- Re: Fw: Spec question
- Re: Fw: Spec question
- Fw: Spec question