www-svg@w3.org from August 2002 by author

AndrewWatt2001@aol.com

• Re: XForms 3.2.2 Linking Attributes (Tuesday, 27 August)
• Re: [svg-developers] SVG/XForms Profile - Status? (Thursday, 22 August)
• SVG/XForms Profile - Status? (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Saturday, 17 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Saturday, 17 August)
• Re: Fw: Spec question (Tuesday, 13 August)
• IHT Link broken (Saturday, 10 August)
• Update the Implementations Page please (Saturday, 10 August)
• [ANN] SVG-Mobile Mailing List (Tuesday, 6 August)

Chris Lilley

• Re: image/svg+xml (Friday, 30 August)
• Re: AW: [ANN] SVG-Mobile Mailing List (Wednesday, 7 August)

Dean Jackson

• Re: Conformance Suite Implementation Status: update? more players/viewers/browsers? (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: SVG/XForms Profile - Status? (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: SVG/XForms Profile - Status? (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: [svg-developers] SVG/XForms Profile - Status? (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: Minutes 20 August 2002 (Tuesday, 20 August)
• Re: A little thing about use... (was Re: svg textLength issue ... ) (Tuesday, 20 August)
• proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Tuesday, 20 August)
• Re: svg textLength issue (and a little thing about use...) (Friday, 16 August)
• Re: [svg-developers] Re: English Please--help understanding SVG 1.1 section 1.1.2 (Wednesday, 14 August)
• Re: Fw: Spec question (Tuesday, 13 August)

Don Henderson

• Re: Conformance Suite Implementation Status: update? more players/viewers/browsers? (Friday, 23 August)

Haeusler Reinhard

• Suggestion for a new XML based pixel graphics format, called PPG (portable pixel graphics) (Tuesday, 27 August)

iztok jeras

• [www-svg] <none> (Thursday, 15 August)

Jim Ley

• Query about Appendix G.12 (Friday, 30 August)
• Re: image/svg+xml (Friday, 30 August)
• image/svg+xml (Friday, 30 August)
• Re: SVG/XForms Profile - Status? (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: SVG/XForms Profile - Status? (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Tuesday, 20 August)
• Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Tuesday, 20 August)
• A little thing about use... (was Re: svg textLength issue ... ) (Tuesday, 20 August)
• Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Tuesday, 20 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: svg textLength issue (and a little thing about use...) (Friday, 16 August)
• svg textLength issue (and a little thing about use...) (Friday, 16 August)
• Fw: Spec question (Tuesday, 13 August)
• Metadata rationale (Friday, 9 August)
• Issue: referencing text/ecmascript in the spec is wrong. (Friday, 9 August)

John Hayman

• RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Thursday, 22 August)
• RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Tuesday, 20 August)
• RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Tuesday, 20 August)

Jon Ferraiolo

• RE: Suggestion for a new XML based pixel graphics format, called PPG (portable pixel graphics) (Wednesday, 28 August)
• RE: foreignObject (Friday, 23 August)
• RE: foreignObject (Friday, 23 August)
• RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Thursday, 22 August)
• RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Tuesday, 20 August)
• RE: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• RE: <use> element and inheritance (Wednesday, 7 August)

Jun Fujisawa

• Re: AW: AW: [ANN] SVG-Mobile Mailing List (Thursday, 22 August)

matthew@hotmail.com

• MORTGAGE RATES JUST DROPPED BELOW 6% FOR 30 YEARS!8018 (Saturday, 31 August)

Niklas Gustavsson

• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)

Pankaj Kamthan

• Re:%20Suggestion%20for%20a%20new%20XML%20based%20pixel%20graphics%20format,%20called%20PPG%20%20(portable%20pixel%20graphics)&I (Tuesday, 27 August)

Robert Diblasi

• SVG 1.1 DTD error in spec....A.1.3 Qualified Name Module in Section B (Friday, 16 August)
• SVG 1. 1 - DTD ..possible error and section 17.4 has error and please add 17.4.1 (Thursday, 15 August)
• Re: [svg-developers] Re: English Please--help understanding SVG 1.1 section 1.1.2 (Wednesday, 14 August)
• Could the SVG Working Group Please Explain PresentationtAttrsAll (Tuesday, 13 August)
• SVG 1.1 : There are some svg elements that are not in acontent set ..Why? (Tuesday, 13 August)
• Possible error in spec 1.1 -missing feature string ? (Tuesday, 13 August)
• Title: SVG 1.1 Why are there some modules not in the specification? (Tuesday, 13 August)
• Editorial error in 11.9 Paint Attribute Module (Tuesday, 13 August)
• Editorial error in SVG 1.1 DTD (Monday, 12 August)
• Error in SVG 1.1 ( editorial ) (Monday, 12 August)

Robin Berjon

• Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Tuesday, 20 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)

Roger Fischer

• AW: AW: AW: [ANN] SVG-Mobile Mailing List (Thursday, 22 August)
• Call for gorgeous SVG slide templates; SlideML and SVG (Wednesday, 14 August)
• AW: AW: [ANN] SVG-Mobile Mailing List (Thursday, 8 August)
• AW: [ANN] SVG-Mobile Mailing List (Tuesday, 6 August)

Ronan Oger

• RE: *****SPAM***** Suggestion for a new XML based pixel graphics format, called PPG (portable pixel graphics) (Tuesday, 27 August)
• RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Tuesday, 20 August)
• RE: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• [ANN] Yet Another SVG Browser: an experimental cross-platform SVG Browser (Monday, 5 August)

Sigurd Lerstad

• Re: foreignObject (Friday, 23 August)
• foreignObject (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: <use> element and inheritance (Thursday, 8 August)
• <use> element and inheritance (Thursday, 8 August)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: XForms 3.2.2 Linking Attributes (Wednesday, 28 August)

Thierry Kormann

• RE: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Tuesday, 20 August)

Thomas E Deweese

• RE: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)

Tobias Reif

• Re: foreignObject (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: foreignObject (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: Conformance Suite Implementation Status: update? more players/viewers/browsers? (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: Conformance Suite Implementation Status: update? more players/viewers/browsers? (Friday, 23 August)
• Conformance Suite Implementation Status: update? more players/viewers/browsers? (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Tuesday, 20 August)
• Re: proposal for this link/tspan discussion (Tuesday, 20 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Saturday, 17 August)
• Re: [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Saturday, 17 August)
• [SVG1.0] no tspan allowed inside an anchor? (Saturday, 17 August)

Vincent Hardy

• Batik 1.5beta4b patch release available (Thursday, 29 August)
• Batik 1.5beta4 available (Wednesday, 28 August)

Yardumian, Rick

• Minutes 20 August 2002 (Tuesday, 20 August)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 August 2002 16:02:59 UTC