- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jon@ferraiolo.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 05:49:24 -0700
- To: "'Sigurd Lerstad'" <sigler@bredband.no>, <www-svg@w3.org>
In my thinking, a foreignObject element will have a requiredExtensions attribute which is a namespace URI which says which "plugin" to the SVG user agent will parse the contents of the foreignObject and produce a rendering based on those contents. If the plugin can deal with multiple children, then you can have multiple children within the foreignObject. Generally, to the SVG user agent, everything inside the foreignObject is opaque. Jon Ferraiolo SVG 1.0 Editor > -----Original Message----- > From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > Sigurd Lerstad > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 11:46 AM > To: www-svg@w3.org > Subject: foreignObject > > > Hello, > > On <foreignObject>, is all but the first child element to be ignored? > > Something like this: > > <foreignObject> > <body xmlns="..."> > <p>blabla</p> > <p>blabla</p> > </body> > -- all other elements are ignored > </foreignObject> > > But is the following also legal? > > <foreignObject xmlns:html="..."> > <html:p>blabla</p> > <html:p>blabla</p> > </foreignObject> > > I have went over this in my head, and can think of several reasons why the > second example should/couldn't be legal.. I just want to make sure... > > thanks, > > -- > Sigurd Lerstad > > >
Received on Friday, 23 August 2002 08:50:22 UTC