www-rdf-logic@w3.org from April 2003 by date

Wednesday, 30 April 2003

• XML Schema version and DAML+OIL/OWL David Martin

Tuesday, 29 April 2003

• Re: Could owl:sameAs reference non-OWL resources? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Could owl:sameAs reference non-OWL resources? Bernard Vatant
• Re: Could owl:sameAs reference non-OWL resources? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Could owl:sameAs reference non-OWL resources? Bernard Vatant

Monday, 28 April 2003

• Re: "explanations" in cwm, vocabulary for proof exchange Dan Connolly
• Qu: cwm think on OWL rules Amy L. Kazura
• Re: Could owl:sameAs reference non-OWL resources? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Could owl:sameAs reference non-OWL resources? Bernard Vatant

Sunday, 27 April 2003

• REMINDER! CfP IEEE Int. Conf. on Industrial Informatics - INDIN03, Banff (Rocky Mountains), Canada, Aug 21-24, 2003 Rainer Unland

Friday, 25 April 2003

• Special Issue of the International Journal of Electronic Commerce (IJEC) Christoph Bussler
• Re: "explanations" in cwm, vocabulary for proof exchange Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: "explanations" in cwm, vocabulary for proof exchange Enrico Franconi
• Re: "explanations" in cwm, vocabulary for proof exchange Enrico Franconi
• ISWC 2003 Industrial Track - DEADLINE EXTENSION Christoph Bussler
• Re: "explanations" in cwm, vocabulary for proof exchange Drew McDermott
• RE: TR: SHOE, DAML : Conflicting definitions of "Thing" ? Bernard Vatant
• Re: "explanations" in cwm, vocabulary for proof exchange Jos De_Roo
• OWL or RDFS Graph? Jimmy Cerra
• Re: TR: SHOE, DAML : Conflicting definitions of "Thing" ? Jim Hendler

Thursday, 24 April 2003

• Re: TR: SHOE, DAML : Conflicting definitions of "Thing" ? Mike Dean
• Re: TR: SHOE, DAML : Conflicting definitions of "Thing" ? Dan Brickley
• Re: TR: SHOE, DAML : Conflicting definitions of "Thing" ? Mike Dean
• 1st CFP: Socio-Cognitive Grids Kostas Stathis
• TR: SHOE, DAML : Conflicting definitions of "Thing" ? Bernard Vatant
• Re: math, ordered relations etc in DAML+OIL Ian Horrocks
• CfP: Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON2003) York Sure

Wednesday, 23 April 2003

• Re: OWL-cool Enrico Franconi
• Re: OWL-cool Ian Horrocks
• Re: Was RDF started in 1989? Then why was it lost? Dan Brickley
• "explanations" in cwm, vocabulary for proof exchange Sandro Hawke
• Re: Was RDF started in 1989? Then why was it lost? Sandro Hawke
• Was RDF started in 1989? Then why was it lost? Jimmy Cerra

Tuesday, 22 April 2003

• Re: OWL-cool Enrico Franconi
• Re: OWL-cool Ian Horrocks
• 2003 Int'l Conf. in CS & CE - Las Vegas, June 23-26, 2003 Hamid Arabnia
• CFP - ACM MDM/KDD 2003 Chabane Djeraba
• Hi wqniu

Wednesday, 16 April 2003

• Espressions of Interest for Proposed AAAI Spring Symposium Series on Semantic Web Services Terry R. Payne

Monday, 14 April 2003

• CfP Int. WS on Autonomic Computing Principles and Architectures, Banff, Canada, Aug. 21- 24 Rainer Unland
• CFP: Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases (colocated with VLDB 2003) Stefan Decker
• math, ordered relations etc in DAML+OIL Daniel Elenius
• Re: What should I use: RDF, DAML+OIW, OWL, XTP, Future Ontology Spec... Jim Hendler
• Re: What should I use: RDF, DAML+OIW, OWL, XTP, Future Ontology Spec... Daniel Elenius
• Re: What should I use: RDF, DAML+OIW, OWL, XTP, Future Ontology Spec... Richard H. McCullough
• Re: What should I use: RDF, DAML+OIW, OWL, XTP, Future Ontology Spec... Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 13 April 2003

• Re: What should I use: RDF, DAML+OIW, OWL, XTP, Future Ontology Spec... Jim Hendler
• What should I use: RDF, DAML+OIW, OWL, XTP, Future Ontology Spec... Jimmy Cerra

Saturday, 12 April 2003

• Student seeking help... NYIT 2003

Thursday, 10 April 2003

• Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: intersectionOf and subClassOf Jeremy Carroll
• Call for Papers: Workshop Multimedia Discovery and Mining Gerhard Paaß

Wednesday, 9 April 2003

• search feature Fabian Weber
• Re: OWL-cool Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 8 April 2003

• Re: OWL and RDFS (from public-webont-comments@w3.org) Davide Noaro
• Re: Owl question Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: OWL and RDFS (from public-webont-comments@w3.org) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: intersectionOf and subClassOf Geoff Chappell
• RE: intersectionOf and subClassOf Jeremy Carroll
• Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 8 April 2002

• Is the week query a inference? citybjc
• Re: ANN: OWL Tutorial citybjc

Tuesday, 8 April 2003

• RE: OWL-cool Bob MacGregor

Monday, 7 April 2003

• Re: Suggestion for change to DAML+OIL walkthru Ian Horrocks
• DAML Query Language (April 2003) released Mike Dean
• RE: intersectionOf and subClassOf Geoff Chappell
• Re: Bridging the Terminology Gap using OWL ... an exciting example (updated) Roger L. Costello
• Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: intersectionOf and subClassOf Geoff Chappell
• Modeling Conventions hagenstonmd@sbcglobal.net

Sunday, 6 April 2003

• Re: OWL-cool Jim Hendler
• Re: Bridging the Terminology Gap using OWL ... an exciting example Thomas B. Passin
• RE: OWL-cool Peter Crowther
• The case for keys (and against InverseFunctionalProperty) Bob MacGregor
• Re: OWL-cool Richard H. McCullough
• OWL-cool Bob MacGregor
• Re: Bridging the Terminology Gap using OWL ... an exciting example (updated) Thomas B. Passin
• Re: Bridging the Terminology Gap using OWL ... an exciting example (updated) Thomas B. Passin
• Re: OWL and RDFS (from public-webont-comments@w3.org) Jim Hendler
• Re: Bridging the Terminology Gap using OWL ... an exciting example (updated) Jim Farrugia
• OWL and RDFS (from public-webont-comments@w3.org) Davide Noaro
• Re: Bridging the Terminology Gap using OWL ... an exciting example (updated) Roger L. Costello
• Re: How burdensome are the OWL restrictions on metadata? Bob MacGregor
• Re: How burdensome are the OWL restrictions on metadata? Yuzhong Qu

Saturday, 5 April 2003

• ISWC2003 CFP deadline extended Mike Dean
• Brazil needs your help Full of Life
• Re: How burdensome are the OWL restrictions on metadata? Bob MacGregor

Friday, 4 April 2003

• Re: ANN: OWL Tutorial Deborah McGuinness
• Re: Bridging the Terminology Gap using OWL ... an exciting example Roger L. Costello
• Re: Bridging the Terminology Gap using OWL ... an exciting example Jim Farrugia
• Re: How burdensome are the OWL restrictions on metadata? Jim Hendler
• How burdensome are the OWL restrictions on metadata? Bob MacGregor
• Bridging the Terminology Gap using OWL ... an exciting example Roger L. Costello

Thursday, 3 April 2003

• RE: logical equivalence of horn clauses? Charlie Abela
• Suggestion for change to DAML+OIL walkthru Daniel Elenius
• Re: logical equivalence of horn clauses? Tanel Tammet
• logical equivalence of horn clauses? Joachim Peer
• How to best use XML Schema in DAML+OIL Daniel Elenius
• help needed: logical equivalence of horn clauses? Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch

Wednesday, 2 April 2003

• RE: DAML Parser subhini.reddy@ps.ge.com
• Re: c# DAML Parsing Mike Dean
• Reviews Sought - OWL Last Call Working Drafts Jim Hendler
• c# DAML Parsing subhini.reddy@ps.ge.com
• Re: Syntactic Mapping vs Class level Drew McDermott

Tuesday, 1 April 2003

• Re: Syntactic Mapping vs Class level Drew McDermott
• Syntactic Mapping vs Class level hagenstonmd@sbcglobal.net
• Re: OWL Lite's restrictions on the use of the OWL vocabulary Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Alpha Release of DAML+OIL plugin for Protege Grit Denker
• Alpha Release of DAML+OIL plugin for Protege Grit Denker

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2003 16:13:50 UTC