- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:12:19 -0400
- To: jimbobbs@hotmail.com
- cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
> Take a look at the graphic [1] at the top of Tim Berners-Lee's original > proposal for the WWW [2]. The similarities between that image and a RDF > graph are remarkable! Is RDF a direct descendent of that work? They have a common ancestor in Semantic Networks. According to one source [1]: "A semantic network ... is a directed graph consisting of vertices which represent concepts and edges which represent semantic relations between the concepts.... It is possible to represent logical descriptions using semantic networks such as the Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce [1839-1914] or the related Conceptual Graphs of John F. Sowa.... Semantic Nets were first invented for computers by Richard H. Richens of the Cambridge Language Research Unit in 1956 as an "interlingua" for machine translation of natural languages. They were developed as "semantic networks" for knowledge representation and reasoning by M. Ross Quillian in 1966." > Why did > the linking mechanism for HTML drift from "semantically useful" arcs to > generic anchors? > Why was the originally intended linking concept > lost and supplanted with the less-effective system predominately used > now? It's not clear to me that hypertext links and have all that much in common with arbitrary 2-place relations. HTML has ample features for specifying types of hypertext links, and they have not caught on as far as I can tell. (I finally have a browser (Opera 7) which actually uses <link rel=...> data, in 2003.) But what does that kind of link have in common with an RDF predicate? I guess you can view clicking on a link as performing a query on the triple <from> ht:link <to> where "from" and "to" identify ranges of document content. And one might reason about those links (as eg Google does), but what does that really have in common with general reasoning about 2-place predicates? -- sandro [1] http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_network
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 23:12:21 UTC