- From: Geoff Chappell <geoff@sover.net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:27:02 -0400
- To: "'Peter F. Patel-Schneider'" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org [mailto:www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 7:57 AM > To: geoff@sover.net > Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org; jjc@hpl.hp.com > Subject: Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf > > [...] > > > This hits indirectly on something else I've been puzzling over. My > > understanding is that the semantics of intersectionOf are if, not iff > > Incorrect. You may be reading part of the RDFS-compatible semantics for > OWL and seeing the ``if''s there. However, what makes the semantics for > owl:intersectionOf iff is the ``='' there. When you say the semantics of intersectionOf are iff, do don't mean: owl:intersectionOf A B iff extension of A = intersection of extensions of classes in B do you? That was the sense in which I meant it but I may be confusing terms or being imprecise in their use. [...] > > peter Thanks, -Geoff
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2003 09:34:17 UTC