Re: TR: SHOE, DAML : Conflicting definitions of "Thing" ?

* Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com> [2003-04-24 16:08-0700]
> 
> > So, clearly the subclassification we get from all that is as following:
> > 
> > Entity > SHOEEntity > PhysicalObject > Thing
> > 
> > On the other end, Thing is defined as the "Top Class" by DAML+OIL
> 
> Recall that in RDF/DAML+OIL/OWL classes and other resources
> are named by full URIs, so
> 
>   http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/DAML/onts/general1.0.daml#Thing
> 
> and
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Thing
> 
> are different Things.

But things can have multiple names; we don't make unique name assumption, do we?

Dan

Received on Thursday, 24 April 2003 19:18:26 UTC