- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:16:13 -0400 (EDT)
- To: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
From: "Bernard Vatant" <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> Subject: RE: Could owl:sameAs reference non-OWL resources? Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:06:02 +0200 > > > Peter > > This is very helpful. Thanks a lot. I think the following is an important > remark for implementors. > > "Go ahead, but please don't say that you actually do stuff with OWL unless > you actually do what is needed by the semantic theory underlying OWL." > > Sure enough! But how will you be sure that we, or other developers, > actually do that? As you know, developers will rush on the easy part, the > syntax ... So do you envision in the future to develop some sort of > conformance test suite for OWL engines, as soon as the standard is stable? > > Bernard Well, there is already a test suite for OWL, but there is no way of making it totally comprehensive. I suppose that it would be possible to develop a program that generates tests without saying what these tests are and then using it to validate implementations. peter
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 08:16:41 UTC