Tuesday, 1 October 1996
- Re: Combine RE/RS proposals?
- Re: Will XML go beyond SGML Users?
- Re: Combine RE/RS proposals?
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Element content the real issue?...
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: Element content the real issue?...
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: More on RE/RS
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Will XML go beyond SGML Users?
- Re: Element content the real issue?...
Monday, 30 September 1996
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Make DTDs optional?
- Re: Element content the real issue?...
- Re: Make DTDs optional?
- Re: More on RE/RS
- Re: Element content the real issue?...
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Make DTDs optional?
- Re: Make DTDs optional?
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Element content the real issue?...
- Re: Make DTDs optional?
- Element content the real issue?...
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: More on RE/RS
- Will XML go beyond SGML Users?
- Combine RE/RS proposals?
- Re: Make DTDs optional?
- Re: Newlines in element content (i.e TABLES)
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Make DTDs optional?
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: More on RE/RS
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Make DTDs optional?
- Characters (Re: questions about entities and entity declarations)
- Re: Make DTDs optional?
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: More on RE/RS
- Re: Newlines in element content (i.e TABLES)
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Additions to the WG
Sunday, 29 September 1996
- Questions about external entities and entity declarations
- Questions about external entities and entity declarations
- Re: Make DTDs optional?
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
Saturday, 28 September 1996
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Make DTDs optional?
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
Friday, 27 September 1996
- Re: Regular expressions and content models (was: Re: questions about element declarations)
- Re: questions about element declarations
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: questions about element declarations
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Regular expressions and content models (was: Re: questions about element declarations)
- Opinions on some of Michael's undiscussed topics
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: More on RE/RS
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: More on RE/RS
- Re: questions about element declarations
- Re: More on RE/RS
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: More on RE/RS
- Re: The RE rules in 14 lines
Thursday, 26 September 1996
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: The RE rules in 14 lines
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: More on RE/RS
- The RE rules in 14 lines
- Re: More on RE/RS
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: Newlines in element content (i.e TABLES)
- Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
- Re: questions about attribute declarations
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: revised restatement of the RE rules
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: Newlines in element content (i.e TABLES)
- Re: Newlines in element content (i.e TABLES)
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
Wednesday, 25 September 1996
- Re: Newlines in element content (i.e TABLES)
- Re: revised restatement of the RE rules
- More on RE/RS
- Newlines in element content (i.e TABLES)
- Re: revised restatement of the RE rules
- Re: revised restatement of the RE rules
- Re: RE/RS Options: One bottom line
- Re: revised restatement of the RE rules
- Re: revised restatement of the RE rules
- Re: revised restatement of the RE rules
- Re: questions about attribute declarations
- Re: Syntax of XML markup declarations
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: revised restatement of the RE rules
Tuesday, 24 September 1996
Wednesday, 25 September 1996
- Re: revised restatement of the RE rules
- Re: questions about attribute declarations
- Re: revised restatement of the RE rules
- Re: revised restatement of the RE rules
Tuesday, 24 September 1996
- Re: questions about attribute declarations
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- revised restatement of the RE rules
- RE rules - summary of corrections
- BANG! or how I gave up SGML and learned to love the browser
- Re: RE/RS Options: Trying to Focus
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: questions about element declarations
- Re: questions about element declarations
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: questions about element declarations
- Re: some topics we haven't yet discussed
- Re: some topics we haven't yet discussed
- Re: RS/RE quoted data proposal
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: some topics we haven't yet discussed
- RE/RS Options: Trying to Focus
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: questions about element declarations
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: Discussion of entities
- Re: some topics we haven't yet discussed
- Syntax of XML markup declarations
- Eliot's issues: & and determinism
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: some topics we haven't yet discussed
- Re: questions about element declarations
- Re: questions about attribute declarations
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: questions about element declarations
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Re: questions about element declarations
- Re: questions about attribute declarations
- Discussion of entities
- Re: questions about element declarations
- Re: questions about entities and entity declarations
- Principles for SGML Compatibility
- Re: questions about attribute declarations
- Re: some topics we haven't yet discussed
- Re: questions about element declarations
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE quoted data proposal
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- questions about entities and entity declarations
- questions about attribute declarations
- questions about element declarations
- some topics we haven't yet discussed
Monday, 23 September 1996
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE quoted data proposal
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- RS/RE quoted data proposal
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: XML Entity Manager
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: XML Entity Manager
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: How you respond to notes
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: How you respond to notes
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: Back to basics
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: How you respond to notes
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- How you respond to notes
Sunday, 22 September 1996
Monday, 23 September 1996
Sunday, 22 September 1996
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: Back to basics
- Re: SGML Entities or Web-style objects in XML?
- some statistics on the impact of various proposals
- Re: Back to basics
- Re: SGML Entities or Web-style objects in XML?
Saturday, 21 September 1996
- Re: SGML Entities or Web-style objects in XML?
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- SGML Entities or Web-style objects in XML?
- Re: XML Entity Manager
- Re: Back to basics
- Re: XML Entity Manager
- Re: XML Entity Manager
- Re: XML Entity Manager
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]]]
- XML Entity Manager
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]]]
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
Thursday, 19 September 1996
Friday, 20 September 1996
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]]]
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- FW: Upcoming SGML Workshops
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Re: RS/RE: basic questions
- Re: XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
Thursday, 19 September 1996
- groves
- Mixed content
- RS/RE: basic questions
- Back to basics
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: Capitalizing on HTML
- Data format/encoding/character set (PI v MIME head)
- Re: Capitalizing on HTML
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- XML vrs SGML tools [was Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was ...)]
- Design principles draft (DD-1996-0001)
- Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML)
- Re: Capitalizing on HTML
- Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML)
- Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML
- Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML)
- Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML
- Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML)
Wednesday, 18 September 1996
- Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML)
- Re: more on equivalences and round-trip integrity
- Re: Limited modified eclectism (was Re: Reads like ASCII)
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: Limited modified eclectism (was Re: Reads like ASCII)
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: Courting Joe Homepage
- Unsolicited fan mail
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: Courting Joe Homepage
- Re: Courting Joe Homepage
- Re: Courting Joe Homepage
- Re: Limited modified eclectism (was Re: Reads like ASCII)
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Reparenting (was Re: A constraint on markup for EMPTY elements)
- Re: Courting Joe Homepage
- Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML
- Re: Limited modified eclectism (was Re: Reads like ASCII)
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: marked sections
- Re: XML and required DTDs
Tuesday, 17 September 1996
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: Capitalizing on HTML (was Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML)
- more on equivalences and round-trip integrity
- Courting Joe Homepage
- Re: Limited modified eclectism (was Re: Reads like ASCII)
- Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Addition to the WG
- Re: Limited modified eclectism (was Re: Reads like ASCII)
- XML and required DTDs
- Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: RS/RE considered confusing?
- Re: client/server XML (was Re: Marked Sections)
- Capitalizing on HTML (was Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML)
- Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML
- Re: RS/RE considered confusing?
- Re: character sets
- Re: RS/RE considered confusing?
- Re: Limited modified eclectism (was Re: Reads like ASCII)
- Re: character sets
- Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML
- Re: Empty endtags (Was: short-tag considered unhealthy)
- Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML
- Re: RS/RE considered confusing?
- Limited modified eclectism (was Re: Reads like ASCII)
- Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML
- Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: equivalent power in SGML and XML
Monday, 16 September 1996
Tuesday, 17 September 1996
- Re: Compatibility issues and principle #3
- Re: Mixed content
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: Mixed content
Monday, 16 September 1996
- Compatibility issues and principle #3
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: (off-topic?)Re: XML character sets: a proposal
- Re: Reads like ASCII (was Re: character sets ...)
- Re: Reads like ASCII (was Re: character sets ...)
- Re: Reads like ASCII (was Re: character sets ...)
- Re: character sets - a summary and a proposal
- Re: (off-topic?)Re: XML character sets: a proposal
- Re: marked sections
- Re: Reads like ASCII (was Re: character sets ...)
- Re: Reads like ASCII (was Re: character sets ...)
- Re: Reads like ASCII (was Re: character sets ...)
- Re: Mixed content
- Re: character sets - a summary and a proposal
- Re: Reads like ASCII (was Re: character sets ...)
- Re: RS/RE considered confusing?
- Re: (off-topic?)Re: XML character sets: a proposal
- Re: character sets - a summary and a proposal
- Re: Mixed content
- Re: XML character sets: a proposal
- Re: (off-topic?)Re: XML character sets: a proposal
- Re: XML character sets: the hard-minimalist manifesto
- Reads like ASCII (was Re: character sets ...)
- Re: character sets - a summary and a proposal
- Re: RS/RE considered confusing?
- (off-topic?)Re: XML character sets: a proposal
- Re: XML character sets: the hard-minimalist manifesto
Sunday, 15 September 1996
Monday, 16 September 1996
Tuesday, 17 September 1996
Monday, 16 September 1996
- Re: Summary of crypto-DTD discussion
- Address changes for SGML WG
- Summary of crypto-DTD discussion
- Re: A constraint on markup for EMPTY elements
Sunday, 15 September 1996
- Re: Stupid NET Tricks
- Re: Empty endtags (Was: short-tag considered unhealthy)
- character sets - a summary and a proposal
- Re: A constraint on markup for EMPTY elements
- Re: Mixed content
- Re: Stupid NET Tricks
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Empty endtags (Was: short-tag considered unhealthy)
- A constraint on markup for EMPTY elements
- Re: Are Heresies Allowed? (Was: RS/RE)
- Re: RS/RE considered confusing?
- Stupid NET Tricks
Saturday, 14 September 1996
- XML draft editors elected
- Re: Are Heresies Allowed? (Was: RS/RE)
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: How XML is defined
- Mixed content
- Re: How XML is defined
- How XML is defined
- Re: XML character sets: a proposal
- Re: XML character sets: a proposal
- Re: XML character sets: a proposal
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: XML character sets: the hard-minimalist manifesto
- Re: marked sections
- Re: Additions to the WG
- Re: short-tag considered unhealthy
- Are Heresies Allowed? (Was: RS/RE)
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: Additions to the WG
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: XML Editors
Friday, 13 September 1996
- Additions to the WG
- Re: XML and required DTDs
- Re: XML Editors
- Re: XML character sets: the hard-minimalist manifesto
- Re: XML Editors
- Re: Empty elements (and processing without a DTD)
- marked sections
- Re: XML Editors
- Re: XML character sets: the hard-minimalist manifesto
- FW: Mainstream SGML - Mary Laplante
- Re: XML character sets: a proposal
- XML and required DTDs
- Re: XML character sets: a proposal
- Re: XML Editors
- Re: Empty elements (and processing without a DTD)
- Re: short-tag considered unhealthy
- Re: Empty elements (and processing without a DTD)
- Re: XML character sets: a proposal
- Re: Marked Sections
- Straw proposals -- get 'em while they're hot!
Thursday, 12 September 1996
- Re: Empty elements (and processing without a DTD)
- Re: RS/RE
- Re: SHORTTAG
- Re: Empty elements (and processing without a DTD)
- Re: PIs and RE handling
- Re: SHORTTAG
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: Empty elements (and processing without a DTD)
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: short-tag considered unhealthy
- Re: short-tag considered unhealthy
- client/server XML (was Re: Marked Sections)
- Re: Marked Sections
- Re: Empty elements (and processing without a DTD)
- Re: SHORTTAG
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: RS/RE
- Re: PIs
- Re: Marked Sections
- Re: short-tag considered unhealthy
- Re: PIs
- RS/RE
- Re: XML character sets: a proposal
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: short-tag considered unhealthy
- RE: SGML or SGML-like
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: short-tag considered unhealthy
- PIs and RE handling
- XML character sets: a proposal
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: PIs
- Re: Compliance with 8879, a moving target
- Re: Empty elements (and processing without a DTD)
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: short-tag considered unhealthy
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: PIs
- Re: PIs
Wednesday, 11 September 1996
Thursday, 12 September 1996
Wednesday, 11 September 1996
- Re: short-tag considered unhealthy
- Empty elements (and processing without a DTD)
- Re: short-tag considered unhealthy
- Role of a DTD in XML
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- SGML or SGML-like : Was Re: SHORTTAG
- Re: Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Re: REFC
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: character sets
- The Hypermail archive
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Additions to the WG
Tuesday, 10 September 1996
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- SGML Declaration in XML (Clause 13)
- Element Structure for XML (Clause 7)
- Common Constructs in XML (Clause 9)
- Entity structure for XML (Clause 6)
- Markup Declarations in XML (Clause 10)
- DTDs in XML (Clause 11)
- Re: quantity sets and capacity sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: character sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- An item of interest to this group, I'd think
- Linux DSSSL application available
- viewing the voting so far
Monday, 9 September 1996
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- quantity sets and capacity sets
- character sets
- Re: Questions about the Questions
- Re: Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Questions about The Questions
- Concrete syntax, character sets
- Re: Questions about The Questions
- Questions about The Questions