- From: Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 96 19:36:44 CDT
- To: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
Questions about entity structure and entity declarations. * should XML require all entities to be synchronous with the document's logical structure? * should XML restrict the types of entities? We seem to agree to keep document entities, text entities, and non-SGML data entities, and to drop subdocument entities, so this boils down to * whether XML should keep or discard the concepts of CDATA and SDATA entities (6.1). * whether XML should retain 'data text' entities (CDATA, SDATA, PI) (10.5.3, 8.1) * whether XML should retain 'bracketed text' entities (STARTTAG, ENDTAG, MS, MD) (10.5.4) * should XML prescribe the use of an ENTITY-END character as the canonical method of handling entity boundaries, as a way of simplifying exposition and implementation (6.2.2)? * should XML retain or relax SGML's prohibition on ENTITY attributes referring to SGML text entities (7.9.4.3)? * if XML makes DTDs optional and allows partial DTDs, what must or may a parser do when it encounters references to undeclared entities (9.4)? Should XML declare any set of entities automatically? * if XML uses ISO 10646, should there be a special form of character reference using hexadecimal, not decimal, numbers, since most references to ISO 10646 and Unicode use hex, not decimal (9.5)? (So references to schwa could take a form like &u0259; or &x0259;, not *#601;, which is rather error-prone, given that nothing in the Unicode documentation gives decimal numbers for the character positions.) * Should XML remove SGML's prohibition on ENTITY attributes for notations (11.4.1)?
Received on Monday, 23 September 1996 20:42:24 UTC