- From: Charles F. Goldfarb <Charles@SGMLsource.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 09:19:10 GMT
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 11 Sep 96 16:23:30 CDT, Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU> wrote: >Like Paul, I guess I think PIs aren't all that hard to deal with, >though it might be nice to specify a canonical method of escaping >PIC within them. I agree. A character reference would do the job nicely. > >Such a self-assigned keyword system is not, of course, 100% reliable, >but it's somewhat more reliable than having no such pattern at all. > You can make it 100% reliable by having each PI "type" declared as a notation (which in fact it is). XML can then require that a PI have the form: <?notation-name actual-text-of-pi> -- Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553 13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management --
Received on Thursday, 12 September 1996 05:19:52 UTC