- From: Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 09 Sep 96 16:01:24 CDT
- To: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 9 Sep 1996 14:34:50 -0400 Martin Bryan said: >Before attempting to answer the questions asked in the forms >associated with DD-1996-002.html it is necessary to raise some >questions about the expectations of our user community. ... >There are many other questions that need to be asked with respect to >the other questions we are asked to vote on, but there is no general >provision for us to attach qualifications or comments to our answers. >I would suggest that a Comments textarea could usefully be added to >each question to allow us to qualify our responses where appropriate. As one of the culprits responsible for the form taken by the voting booth, let me concur in the view that qualifications and comments on the questions before us are clearly necessary and important. Our idea -- my idea, at least, and I think Tim Bray and Jon Bosak agree -- was and remains that such comments are most usefully made on this list, in order that they can contribute to the general discussion. On the specific questions you raise, I will hazard some views, in separate postings (as requested by Jon Bosak), as a way of getting some discussion rolling. I'm not sure whether I am disagreeing with you or not; although your questions are phrased as if neutral, they seem to reflect some strong, though unspoken, biases on your part for or against particular answers. The questions you raise seem eminently relevant to those raised in the voting booth; I respectfully dissent, however, from your suggestion that they are logically prior questions which must be answered *before* those in DD-1996-0002. -C. M. Sperberg-McQueen ACH / ACL / ALLC Text Encoding Initiative University of Illinois at Chicago tei@uic.edu All opinions expressed in this note (except those I have quoted from other authors) are mine. They are not necessarily those of the Text Encoding Initiative, its executive committee or other participants, its sponsors, or its funders. Anyone who says otherwise is wrong.
Received on Monday, 9 September 1996 17:03:22 UTC