- From: Charles F. Goldfarb <Charles@SGMLsource.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 19:54:23 GMT
- To: "Christopher R. Maden" <crm@ebt.com>, Bill Smith <bill.smith@eng.sun.com>
- Cc: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 25 Sep 1996 20:57:23 GMT, "Christopher R. Maden" <crm@ebt.com> wrote: >Several people have proposed defining the RE/RS problem out of >existence by defining the RE and RS function charcters as codes that >won't occur in entities, via the SGML application for XML. The standard (and the Handbook) recognize the possibility that records might not exist in some storage formats. In those cases, you can assign RE/RS out of existence. But when records actually exist, you *cannot* evade handling them by not assigning RE/RS and sweeping them under the rug (where "rug" = application or entity manager). If a document is created in an editor that lets you enter tags as text, you must deal with REs. That is because you could be using white space to "format" the source text, and some of that whitespace will be indistinguishable from true information. (See my earlier postings on this point.) If the editor only lets you enter elements through menu selection, it can avoid having any "formatting" REs in its source document. It is for such editors that the standard makes provision for assigning the RE/RS characters out of existence. Bottom line: You can assign the RE/RS characters out of existence, but not the RE/RS problem. It is inherent in all direct entry of markup and undelimited data, not just SGML. -- Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553 13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management --
Received on Thursday, 26 September 1996 15:52:19 UTC