- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 11:56:19 +0000
- To: mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com
- Cc: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
> From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com> > Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 10:54:23 +0100 > > The set of documents I would like to see "grandfathered in" is that set > defined in (valid) HTML. I just don't think this is practical. HTML relies OMITTAG (notably for P, LI, DT, DD). I don't see how we can possibly achieve our ease of implementation goals if we support OMITTAG in XML. > If an XML browser cannot read that set of raw HTML > documents that are valid according to the 2.0 DTD (or later versions) then > it will not be of much practical use, and will be ignored by the majority of > potential users. I don't need to use an XML browser to browse HTML; I've already got plenty of HTML browsers that do that just fine. James
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 1996 07:01:49 UTC