Issue 23: relationship of interface annotations in face of interface extension
regrets
What does modelReference on wsdl:interface mean ?
Draft minutes of telcon 2006/06/27
Resolutions from f2f documented for review
Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2006/06/27
Summary and draft minutes of f2f meeting 2006/06/20-21
[issue10] what about multiple categories ?
[issue 10] can you give more details ?
[Updated Draft v1.3] SAWSDL to UDDI and WSDL 2.0 to UDDI mapping
issue 1 resolution
[pierre.chatel@fr.thalesgroup.com: [Moderator Action (size limit exceeded)] [Updated Draft v1.1] SAWSDL to UDDI and WSDL 2.0 to UDDI mapping]
Issues 18 and 6 (partial) have been documented
Draft minutes of telcon 2006/06/13
First draft of SAWSDL to UDDI and WSDL 2.0 to UDDI mapping
Action Item: RDFS ontology for interface
RE: SAWSDL Category [section 2.3 of Semantic Annotations for WSDL ]
issue 18: Relation of multiple modelReferences
Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2006/06/13
SAWSDL Category [section 2.3 of Semantic Annotations for WSDL]
Draft minutes of telcon 2006/06/06
Fwd: Generating test data sets
Mapping SAWSDL/WSDL-S into UDDI
- Re: Mapping SAWSDL/WSDL-S into UDDI
- Re: Mapping SAWSDL/WSDL-S into UDDI
- RE: Mapping SAWSDL/WSDL-S into UDDI
Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11): allowing internal and external ModelReferences on the same element
Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2006/06/06
Re: action on category vs modelReference
RE: Consistency Issues in multiple modelReferences
Re: email headers (was Re: ACTION 07)
Re: Issue 2 documented
Re: schemaMapping issues breakdown (issue 6)
- Re: schemaMapping issues breakdown (issue 6)
- Re: schemaMapping issues breakdown (issue 6)
- why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11)
- Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11)
- Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11)
- Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11)