W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-semann@w3.org > June 2006

issue 1 resolution

From: <Pierre.CHATEL@fr.thalesgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:12:43 +0200
Message-ID: <487273D52219D811B209000347AE974A033A6C99@hermes.wins>
To: public-ws-semann@w3.org

Hi,

issue 1 concerning the use of xs:anyURI is now closed.
But, since every QName is syntactically a URI, is the QName -like syntax (like rosetta:RequestPurchaseOrder) still valid in the current SAWSDL specification ? Or should we use something like rosetta#RequestPurchaseOrder.

In the 2006/06/15 version of the spec I find 3 different syntaxes, which ones are valid ?

1 - Relative with QName-like syntax

xmlns:Rosetta="http://example.org/examples/ontologies/rosetta.owl
....
sawsdl:modelReference="Rosetta:RequestPurchaseOrder

2 - Absolute with # but no .owl extension to the ontology url

sawsdl:modelReference="http://example.org/examples/ontologies/purchaseorder#OrderConfirmation

3 - How is defined POOntology in this example ? Is it like in 1 ?

<xs:element name="quantity" type="xs:integer"
    sawsdl:modelReference="POOntology#Quantity"/

Thanks !

--
Pierre Chatel
THALES COMMUNICATIONS FRANCE
SC2 - Software Core for Computer-based systems
1-5, Avenue Carnot / BC4
91883 Massy CEDEX
Tel 01 69 75 30 57
Received on Thursday, 15 June 2006 13:12:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:45 UTC