W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-semann@w3.org > June 2006

Re: issue 1 resolution

From: Holger Lausen <holger.lausen@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:31:04 +0200
To: Pierre.CHATEL@fr.thalesgroup.com
Cc: public-ws-semann@w3.org
Message-id: <4496D148.60600@deri.org>
Hi,

in fact I think you pointed out an inconsistency in the spec. We should
always use absolute URIs. Especially since we often only depict parts of
the schema (the use of relative URIS together with a base URI would be
confusing).

best
  Holger


Pierre.CHATEL@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> issue 1 concerning the use of xs:anyURI is now closed.
> But, since every QName is syntactically a URI, is the QName -like syntax (like rosetta:RequestPurchaseOrder) still valid in the current SAWSDL specification ? Or should we use something like rosetta#RequestPurchaseOrder.
> 
> In the 2006/06/15 version of the spec I find 3 different syntaxes, which ones are valid ?
> 
> 1 - Relative with QName-like syntax
> 
> xmlns:Rosetta="http://example.org</examples/ontologies/rosetta.owl
> ....
> sawsdl:modelReference="Rosetta:RequestPurchaseOrder
> 
> 2 - Absolute with # but no .owl extension to the ontology url
> 
> sawsdl:modelReference="http://example.org/examples/ontologies/purchaseorder#OrderConfirmation
> 
> 3 - How is defined POOntology in this example ? Is it like in 1 ?
> 
> <xs:element name="quantity" type="xs:integer"
>     sawsdl:modelReference="POOntology#Quantity"/
> 
> Thanks !
> 
> --
> Pierre Chatel
> THALES COMMUNICATIONS FRANCE
> SC2 - Software Core for Computer-based systems
> 1-5, Avenue Carnot / BC4
> 91883 Massy CEDEX
> Tel 01 69 75 30 57
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Holger Lausen

Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
http://www.deri.org/

Tel:   +43 512 5076464
Email: holger.lausen@deri.org


Received on Monday, 19 June 2006 16:31:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:45 UTC