- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:47:10 +0200
- To: Pierre Châtel <Pierre.CHATEL@fr.thalesgroup.com>
- Cc: public-ws-semann@w3.org
Dear Pierre, the SAWSDL spec is independent of any taxonomies, but the ones you mention could be pointed to as examples. I opened new issue 20 [1] to consider that. If you decide to use SAWSDL (or WSDL-S) in your work, you can already use these taxonomies, most probably you'd put those tModel URIs as taxonomyURI on interface category. Hope it helps, Jacek On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 23:53 +0200, Pierre Châtel wrote: > Hi List, > > me again. Since I'm continuing my work on mapping sawsdl into UDDI, I > noticed that you did not specified any normalized URIs for > referencing NAICS, UNSPNC or GICS taxonomies. > Wouldn't it be great to use the ones that are specified in http:// > uddi.org/taxonomies/UDDI_Taxonomy_tModels.htm ? > Like http://www.uddi.org/taxonomies/UDDI_Taxonomy_tModels.htm#NAICS > for NAICS > or http://www.uddi.org/taxonomies/UDDI_Taxonomy_tModels.htm#UNSPSC > for UNSPNC ? > > This way i would be able to map the categorization information > provided by a SAWSDL service definition by directly using the > standard UDDI taxonomy tModels (just by matching URIs when mapping to > UDDI) ! > > Pierre >
Received on Monday, 12 June 2006 14:47:20 UTC